robots-exclusion-issues

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(Add reference to an implementation of a similar concept in response to a to-do item)
(Moving PeterJ's 2008 open issue to the Issues section + updated the (dead) URL)
Line 48: Line 48:
* {{OpenIssue}} Isn't the Robot Exclusion Profile designed for machines first and humans second instead of vice versa?  Yes, just as much as [[rel-nofollow]], the deployed microformat that it's designed to replace.
* {{OpenIssue}} Isn't the Robot Exclusion Profile designed for machines first and humans second instead of vice versa?  Yes, just as much as [[rel-nofollow]], the deployed microformat that it's designed to replace.
* I'd like to echo this concern. We need to discuss whether or not this is a suitable microformat. --[[User:RyanKing|RyanKing]] 13:34, 17 Jan 2006 (PST)
* I'd like to echo this concern. We need to discuss whether or not this is a suitable microformat. --[[User:RyanKing|RyanKing]] 13:34, 17 Jan 2006 (PST)
 +
 +
=== 2008 ===
 +
* {{OpenIssue}} 2008-10-09 raised by [[User: PeterJ|PeterJ]]. Yahoo! has implemented a similar [http://www.ysearchblog.com/2007/05/02/introducing-robots-nocontent-for-page-sections/] class.
== template ==
== template ==

Revision as of 01:11, 24 March 2013

robots exclusion issues

Contents

These are externally raised issues about robots exclusion with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues are REJECTED for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be ACCEPTED and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec.

IMPORTANT: Please read the robots exclusion FAQ before giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered.

Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — Tantek

For matters relating to the meta robots specification itself, see meta-robots-errata and meta-robots-suggestions.

closed issues

Resolved issues that have no further actions to take. These will likely be moved to a separate page like robots-exclusion-issues-closed.

resolved issues

Issues that are resolved but may have outstanding to-do items. As issues are resolved, they will be moved from the top of the Issues list to the bottom of this section.

2005

Precedence

Phrases

Specificity

Keywords

issues

2006

Suitability as a microformat

2008

template

Please use this format (copy and paste this to the end of the list to add your issues):

related pages

robots-exclusion-issues was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views