robots-exclusion-issues

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
m (2008: Typo)
Current revision (11:25, 22 September 2013) (view source)
m (Reverted edits by I MADE THOUSANDS OF ACCOUNTS IN MICROFORMATS WIKI GO TO CHECK OUT THE USER LIST ([[User talk:I MADE THOUSANDS OF ACCOUNTS IN MICROF)
 
(2 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 19: Line 19:
* ''The "efficacy" issues from [[rel-nofollow#open_issues|rel="nofollow"]] also apply.''
* ''The "efficacy" issues from [[rel-nofollow#open_issues|rel="nofollow"]] also apply.''
** ACCEPTED. The key here would be to get one or more search engines to implement it and get others to do so as well, just as the original [[meta robots]] specification.
** ACCEPTED. The key here would be to get one or more search engines to implement it and get others to do so as well, just as the original [[meta robots]] specification.
-
*** Yahoo! has implemented a similar [http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/webcrawler/slurp-14.html robots-nocontent] class.
 
* ''The "collateral damage" issues from [[rel-nofollow#open_issues|rel="nofollow"]] also apply.''
* ''The "collateral damage" issues from [[rel-nofollow#open_issues|rel="nofollow"]] also apply.''
** REJECTED EXAMPLE NEEDED.
** REJECTED EXAMPLE NEEDED.

Current revision

robots exclusion issues

Contents

These are externally raised issues about robots exclusion with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues are REJECTED for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be ACCEPTED and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec.

IMPORTANT: Please read the robots exclusion FAQ before giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered.

Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — Tantek

For matters relating to the meta robots specification itself, see meta-robots-errata and meta-robots-suggestions.

closed issues

Resolved issues that have no further actions to take. These will likely be moved to a separate page like robots-exclusion-issues-closed.

resolved issues

Issues that are resolved but may have outstanding to-do items. As issues are resolved, they will be moved from the top of the Issues list to the bottom of this section.

2005

Precedence

Phrases

Specificity

Keywords

issues

2006

Suitability as a microformat

2008

template

Please use this format (copy and paste this to the end of the list to add your issues):

related pages

robots-exclusion-issues was last modified: Sunday, September 22nd, 2013

Views