Difference between revisions of "service-formats"

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 17: Line 17:
 
== Authors ==
 
== Authors ==
 
* [[User:Wowitim|Wowitim]] 17:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 
* [[User:Wowitim|Wowitim]] 17:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== See Also ==
 +
* [[service]]
 +
* [[product]]
 +
* [[hlisting]]

Revision as of 17:57, 28 March 2009

Current Service Schemas

This page shows a little of the current markup landscape on services sites as the basis for the design of an hService microformat.

Active Schemas

We're ignoring RFP and contracts-oriented sites because they're not selling services but opportunities, and they're not in common use by a significant proportion of the population.

Problems with Active Schemas

In our view active schemas are too simplistic. Yahoo effectively prohibits service-specific fields, and Google Base permits only service_type as a service-specific field. Not useful if you're selling 5 kinds of garden waste services!

Conclusion

There is a need for a specific microformat dedicated to providing detailed universal structure to services provided to businesses and consumers.

Authors

See Also