service-formats

From Microformats Wiki
Revision as of 17:50, 28 March 2009 by Wowitim (talk | contribs) (New page: = Current Service Schemas = This page will show the current landscape of markup on manufacturer and e-commerce sites as the basis for the design of an hService microformat. == Active Sch...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Current Service Schemas

This page will show the current landscape of markup on manufacturer and e-commerce sites as the basis for the design of an hService microformat.

Active Schemas

We're ignoring RFP and contracts-oriented sites because they're not selling services but opportunities, and they're not in common use by a significant proportion of the population.

Problems with Active Schemas

In our view active schemas are too simplistic. Yahoo effectively prohibits service-specific fields, and Google Base permits only service_type as a service-specific field. Not useful if you're selling 5 kinds of garden waste services!

Conclusion

There is a need for a specific microformat dedicated to providing detailed universal structure to services provided to businesses and consumers.

Authors