xfolk-to-rdf: Difference between revisions

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Further explanation.)
m (Formatting change)
Line 9: Line 9:
xFolk can be thought of as a minimal version of hReview.
xFolk can be thought of as a minimal version of hReview.


{| border="1" style="float:left"
{| border="1"
|-
|-
! hReview Term
! hReview Term

Revision as of 07:36, 20 June 2008

xFolk/hReview → RDF

Only a rough sketch on a piece of paper so far. "X" is the review, "Y" is the item being reviewed.

to-rdf.jpeg

xFolk / hReview Equivalence

xFolk can be thought of as a minimal version of hReview.

hReview Term xFolk Term
hreview xfolkentry
version /
summary /
type type is always "url"
item fn taggedlink (link text)
item url taggedlink (href)
item photo /
reviewer /
dtreviewed /
rating (best, worst) /
description description
tag tag
permalink /
license /

With this in mind, an xFolk entry can be treated as simply a funny-looking hReview and the hReview to RDF mapping then applied to xFolk.