User:LynX: Difference between revisions
(meditation) |
m (fixed, thx) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
So I'm asking.. can we be private on the web? And if we need to create such a private web first, why bother? Why not use an optimized protocol to achieve our goals instead of extracting them from documents that hardly anyone will read? | So I'm asking.. can we be private on the web? And if we need to create such a private web first, why bother? Why not use an optimized protocol to achieve our goals instead of extracting them from documents that hardly anyone will read? | ||
Then again, if I look at how we implemented our [http://about.psyc.eu/Profile | Then again, if I look at how we implemented our [http://about.psyc.eu/Profile profile surfing] feature, would it make sense to have a microformat in the profile instead of having the profile page generated out of the profile data? Could be. I'll meditate about it. | ||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 7 September 2007
I'm into decentralized social networks so I'm also interested in social-network-portability, although I'd first want to see the first thing happen - then the rest can be ported, if it cares to.
I'm a bit surprised we ended up on microformats to this purpose, as publishing things on the web is fundamentally anti-privacy, and that's an essential goal for social networking.
So I'm asking.. can we be private on the web? And if we need to create such a private web first, why bother? Why not use an optimized protocol to achieve our goals instead of extracting them from documents that hardly anyone will read?
Then again, if I look at how we implemented our profile surfing feature, would it make sense to have a microformat in the profile instead of having the profile page generated out of the profile data? Could be. I'll meditate about it.