meeting-minutes-formats: Difference between revisions

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Meeting Minutes: Existing Formats: - add some analysis of W3C's approach)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


* W3C has thought a bit about this, but doesn't appear to have completed any implementation
* W3C has thought a bit about this, but doesn't appear to have completed any implementation
** [http://www.w3.org/2002/11/DAML-IOW#Specific Suggestions for using RDF/OWL] for marking up meeting records.
** [http://cellularlampung.blogspot.co.id Suggestions for using RDF/OWL] for marking up meeting records.
** What seem to be DanC's [http://www.w3.org/2000/11/mr76/ work on RDF schema for minutes], for use with W3C tools.
** What seem to be DanC's [http://lowongankerjalampung161289.blogspot.co.id work on RDF schema for minutes], for use with W3C tools.
** A [http://esw.w3.org/topic/MeetingRecords wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] includes some "noodling" on meeting record ontology, as well as other resources at the end.
** A [http://www.jasacleaningservice.id/2017/02/tempat-kursus-service-rakit-komputer-di.html wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] includes some "noodling" on meeting record ontology, as well as other resources at the end.
** These resources are based on the schema implicit in W3C's agenda, action item, and participation tracking agents, RSSAgent and Zakim, as noted in [[meeting-minutes-examples]].
** These resources are based on the schema implicit in W3C's agenda, action item, and participation tracking agents, RSSAgent and Zakim, as noted in [[meeting-minutes-examples]].
* W3C's approach is focused on how to create usable data for computer assistance in meeting organization and recording.
* W3C's approach is focused on how to create usable data for computer assistance in meeting organization and recording.
** This means that it includes kinds of data that would otherwise be in the "20%" category according to our analysis, such as specific kinds of decision details, agenda preparation, further details on participation, etc.  (See [http://esw.w3.org/topic/MeetingRecords wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] again, in particular.)
** This means that it includes kinds of data that would otherwise be in the "20%" category according to our analysis, such as specific kinds of decision details, agenda preparation, further details on participation, etc.  (See [http://tempatrakitkursusservicekomputer.blogspot.co.id/ wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] again, in particular.)
** Agenda preparation, meeting calling, etc. is more of a focus for W3C; a more comprehensive, extended role for meeting recording.  Is this something we want to prepare for?
** Agenda preparation, meeting calling, etc. is more of a focus for W3C; a more comprehensive, extended role for meeting recording.  Is this something we want to prepare for?


None of these seem to be a complete schema.  What am I missing?
None of these seem to be a complete schema.  What am I missing?
== See Also ==
* [[meeting-minutes-examples]]
* [[meeting-minutes-brainstorming]]

Latest revision as of 13:25, 19 February 2017

Meeting Minutes: Existing Formats

I don't know of any fully described existing schema for meeting minutes; please help with this section! - Brush

  • W3C has thought a bit about this, but doesn't appear to have completed any implementation
  • W3C's approach is focused on how to create usable data for computer assistance in meeting organization and recording.
    • This means that it includes kinds of data that would otherwise be in the "20%" category according to our analysis, such as specific kinds of decision details, agenda preparation, further details on participation, etc. (See wiki discussion page about Meeting Records again, in particular.)
    • Agenda preparation, meeting calling, etc. is more of a focus for W3C; a more comprehensive, extended role for meeting recording. Is this something we want to prepare for?

None of these seem to be a complete schema. What am I missing?

See Also