hbib-discussion-2005-05-14: Difference between revisions

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(created from an archive html document for historical purposes)
 
(Undo revision 36110 by NodarMonel (Talk)(vandalism))
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 17:26, 20 December 2008

hBib Description 2005-05-14

This is a historical capture and therefore the below pre/nowiki contents MUST NOT be edited.

For current related efforts, see citation.

The following document was created, collaboratively edited live 2005-05-14 during the WWW2005 workshop and presentations on microformats. 

<nowiki>

<body style="font-size:130%">

<h1>hBib: une charette</h1>
<p><em>an interactive design session</em></p>

<h2>Authors</h2>
<ul>
<li class="vcard"><a class="url fn" href="http://tantek.com/log/">Tantek Çelik</a></li> 
 <!-- numerical character entities work for XHTML and XML in general, 
whereas named character entities only work in HTML and *some* XHTML user agents -->
<li class="vcard"><a class="url fn" href="#">Rohit Khare</a></li>
<li class="vcard"><a class="url fn" href="http://meyerweb.com/">Eric A. Meyer</a></li>
<li class="vcard"><a class="url fn" href="http://www.markbaker.ca">Mark Baker</a></li>
<li class="vcard"><a class="url fn" href="http://www.wiredpen.com/">Kathy Gill</a></li>
<li class="vcard fn">Bert Bos

<li> ***** add your hcard here *****</li>

<li>& other participants from the Microformats track on Dev Day at WWW 2005</li>

</ul>

<br> Solution?
<br>Author -- should use hCard. OK

<br>Mulitple authors? Multiple hCards.
<br> use hidden SPANs?
<br> use CSS classes for k-authors: 1st-author, 2nd-author? generic "author" class?
<br> ol + span?

<br> how to "loft" dc:author inot microformats use in CSS class= attrs? -- 
<em>create an XMDP for Dublin Core (creator, etc)</em>
<pre>
.author + .author + .author + .author {display: none}
.author + .author + .author {content: " et al."}


Existing Example

Let's start with a concrete example of a particular bibliography presentation 

[1] Goland, Y. Y., Nottingham, M. and Orchard, D. WS-CallBack Protocol 0.91.
 BEA Systems, WS-CallBack Protocol 0.91, Feb 26 2003 2003. 
 http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/WS-CallBack-0_9.jsp

How would we mark that up?

<span class="vcard">
 <span class="fn n">
  <span class="family-name "<Goland</span>, 
  <abbr class="given-name" title="Yaron">Y.</abbr>
 </span>
</span>

Goals

  1. Stop having to re-key references!
  2. Adapt to new Journal styles solely by changin the CSS?

Why a Microformat?

  1. Presentation matters!
  2. A predecessor format exists:
    • BibTeX
    • Endnote
    • Dublin Core

the microformats way

  • solve a specific problem
  • make evolutionary improvements
  • be as simple as possible, perhaps solve a simpler problem first
  • adapt to current behaviors and usage patterns, e.g. (X)HTML, blogging
  • presentable and parsable
  • reuse existing microformats and well established schemas (e.g. IETF RFCs) as building blocks
  • design to be reused and embedded inside existing formats and microformats
  • enable and encourage decentralized development and services

The Microformats Checklist

Specific Problem?
Are we close? the library science rathole is pretty deep, folks....


Notes

Typically have access to "rendered"/"flattened" papers without the structured data

</nowiki>

Retrieved from "http://microformats.org/wiki/index.php?title=hbib-discussion-2005-05-14&oldid=36142"