[uf-dev] HTML::Microformats 0.00_08

[Tantek Celik]

This is great news - thanks Toby!

In answer to your question:

>  I'd like a bit of feedback here: right now I'm looking at the Atom <content> element, but would
<summary> make more sense?

In my opinion <content> if it is there, and if not, then <summary>.

Anecdotally on feeds with both, I have often seen <summary> used with a short bit of plain text, with richer, more structured/semantic markup in the <content>.

Make sense?

This is a good question and I think it is worth writing up in a page on the wiki like:

http://microformats.org/wiki/atom-faq

Or perhaps in a new "Atom" section on

http://microformats.org/wiki/parsing

(Nice work on http://microformats.org/wiki/parsing-brainstorming btw - I just re-read it.)

Tantek


-----Original Message-----
From: Toby Inkster <mail at tobyinkster.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:55:35 
To: <microformats-dev at microformats.org>
Subject: [uf-dev] HTML::Microformats 0.00_08

The only major change is to add support for these profile URIs:

	http://microformats.org/profile/specs
	http://ufs.cc/x/specs

There are a few other internal changes which don't effect end users,
but were designed to support...

	XML::Atom::Microformats 0.00_02

Which is a new module that goes through an Atom feed, parsing the
content of each entry for Microformats. I'd like a bit of feedback
here: right now I'm looking at the Atom <content> element, but would
<summary> make more sense?

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail at tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-dev mailing list
microformats-dev at microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-dev