[uf-discuss] Nomenclature Question (II)

Tantek Ç elik tantek at cs.stanford.edu
Thu Dec 8 07:28:18 PST 2005

On 12/8/05 3:14 AM, "David Janes -- BlogMatrix" <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com>

> "adr" and "geo" standing there all nekkid as microformat names makes me
> kind of nervous. How about
> adr-mixin, geo-mixin
> mAdr, mGeo (for mixin)
> cAdr, cGeo (for component)
> to recognize their potential as mixin/components for other uFs?

The introduction of mixing/component aspects into the name feels too
programmer-centric (while microformats as a whole seek to be

Also, "adr" and "geo" reflect the precise value of the root class names to
be used, and thus their names are useful mnemonics for the (beginning of
the) format.



More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list