[microformats-discuss] RFC: Thoughts on Video and Audio Microformats

Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 10:59:31 PDT 2005


On 10/18/05, David Janes -- BlogMatrix <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com> wrote:


> Hi Charles,
> XHTML (based on HTML 4.01) compliance is considered a MUST [1] here in
> the microformats community. "rel" and "rev" may fly (I haven't looked
> too closely) but "urn" is toast [2].

You are quite right.  I should have actually looked at the newer HTML
spec.  (Instead of non-authoritative sources.)

See ya

> My XHTML compliance checking is quite functionally based on [3].
> Regards, etc...
> David
> http://www.blogmatrix.com
> [1] upper-case MUST in the RFC sense, not the I'm yelling at you sense
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/links.html#edef-A
> [3] http://validator.w3.org/

     Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.

     charles @ reptile.ca
     supercanadian @ gmail.com

     developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
 Never forget where you came from

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list