[uf-discuss] rel-xxx proposal

[Luke Arno]

On 10/26/05, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 10/26/05, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 10/26/05, Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 10/26/05, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I don't know of any current Microformat that covers this topic or
> > > > anything in the wild that covers it either.  Here's basically what I
> > > > propose:
> > > >
> > > >     <a rel="xxx" href="http://xxx-site.example.com/">XXX Site</a>
> > >
> > > Perhaps a "NSFW" ("not safe for work") microformat would be more
> > > appropriate/useful?  There are many, many real-world examples (e.g.
> > > Metafilter on any Friday).
> >
> > That's one use case for this.  But not the only one.  Marking
> > something as "NSFW" does not really tell you that little kids should
> > NOT be exposed to it.
>
> I guess to say it more accurately, I'm trying to have a way as marking
> something as being pornographic.  It's a much smaller problem than
> trying to marking something as being "NSFW".
>
> (This decision to mark something as being pornographic is a cultural
> and personal decision.)
>

Should it be rated: xxx1, xxx2, xxx3? (seriously)

Or more fine grained: xxx-footfetish? (LOL -1/4 serious)

I know this could be very useful but I just can't
help having a laugh :)

- Luke