[uf-discuss] rel-xxx proposal
luke.arno at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 14:22:43 PDT 2005
On 10/26/05, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/05, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > On 10/26/05, Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 10/26/05, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I don't know of any current Microformat that covers this topic or
> > > > anything in the wild that covers it either. Here's basically what I
> > > > propose:
> > > >
> > > > <a rel="xxx" href="http://xxx-site.example.com/">XXX Site</a>
> > >
> > > Perhaps a "NSFW" ("not safe for work") microformat would be more
> > > appropriate/useful? There are many, many real-world examples (e.g.
> > > Metafilter on any Friday).
> > That's one use case for this. But not the only one. Marking
> > something as "NSFW" does not really tell you that little kids should
> > NOT be exposed to it.
> I guess to say it more accurately, I'm trying to have a way as marking
> something as being pornographic. It's a much smaller problem than
> trying to marking something as being "NSFW".
> (This decision to mark something as being pornographic is a cultural
> and personal decision.)
Should it be rated: xxx1, xxx2, xxx3? (seriously)
Or more fine grained: xxx-footfetish? (LOL -1/4 serious)
I know this could be very useful but I just can't
help having a laugh :)
More information about the microformats-discuss