[uf-discuss] hReview and the structured blogging tools

[David Janes -- BlogMatrix]

As you know, the structured blogging people have released plugins [1] 
for MT and WordPress that generate microformatted output and, well, 
structured blogging output.

I tried using their review generator and produced [2] which you can see 
[2] doesn't quite get the encoding of the reviews correct.

I was going to send some comments to Phil Pearson about this but I'm 
really not sure what the correct way to encode the review rating are. In 
particular:

(1) are the sub-ratings (i.e. quality of service: 3/5) always going to 
be dependent on rel-tag
(2) if it does ... where should the authority be for tags be? Is 
"anything will do" the correct answer?

Regards, etc...
David

[1] http://structuredblogging.org/
[2] http://www.davidjanes.com/wp/?p=3
[3] http://tinyurl.com/behre