[uf-discuss] hReview feedback

[Scott Reynen]

Paul Bryson wrote:

> Sadly, as the information is distilled, it is impossible to know if  
> the page
> actually mentions the upper or lower bound without visiting the page.

Indeed.  And some have no links...

> Consumer Reviews
>     * reviewed item
>     * reviewed item version
>     * rating
>           o overall 1-100
>           o by category 1-5
>     * definition list of specifications
>
> That is 1...

I didn't count that because I was unable to verify it exists after  
looking through the first page of Google results for "Consumer  
Reviews".  The history [1] shows RyanKing added that with the  
original page, so perhaps he can shed some light on what website that  
references.  Even assuming it still exists, 1 case is far from 80%,  
so I would still question the choice of 1 as the default lower bound  
in hReview.

[1] http://microformats.org/wiki?title=reviews- 
formats&action=history&limit=250&offset=0

Peace,
Scott