[uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

Ryan King ryan at technorati.com
Thu Mar 23 09:53:34 PST 2006

On Mar 23, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Chris Casciano wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Robert Bachmann wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>> Thanks for your feedback.
>> Please note that feed title, feed updated, feed id and feed link
>> aren't covered by hAtom 0.1.
>> So we (the stylesheet authors) needed to come up with our own  
>> extraction
>> methods, which I'll outline with some pseudo-code.
> As I posed in IRC yesterday -- is it really up to the stylesheet /  
> authors of consumers to determine this stuff? Almost definitely  
> this should become part of the spec/wiki and consensus reached --  
> both for the benefit of tool authors -- but also the benefit of  
> page builders like myself who are trying to reconcile differences  
> between hAtom and the Atom spec and wondering how they work together..

Yes, I think it *should* be. They were left out of 0.1 for the sake  
of getting something out the door.


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list