[uf-discuss] hAtom look-see

[Dr. Ernie Prabhakar]

Is there "TBD" section of the wiki to start the discussion about 0.2?

On Mar 23, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Ryan King wrote:

> On Mar 23, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Chris Casciano wrote:
>> On Mar 22, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Robert Bachmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>> Please note that feed title, feed updated, feed id and feed link
>>> aren't covered by hAtom 0.1.
>>> So we (the stylesheet authors) needed to come up with our own  
>>> extraction
>>> methods, which I'll outline with some pseudo-code.
>>>
>>
>> As I posed in IRC yesterday -- is it really up to the stylesheet /  
>> authors of consumers to determine this stuff? Almost definitely  
>> this should become part of the spec/wiki and consensus reached --  
>> both for the benefit of tool authors -- but also the benefit of  
>> page builders like myself who are trying to reconcile differences  
>> between hAtom and the Atom spec and wondering how they work  
>> together..
>
> Yes, I think it *should* be. They were left out of 0.1 for the sake  
> of getting something out the door.
>
> -rk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss