[uf-discuss] Custom Fields Microformat?

[Stephen Paul Weber]

> Since XOXO itself only defines nested lists (and sets) of items with
> arbitrary properties/values (with a certain fixed known set for compat with
> existing uses), there is no expectation that user/author defined properties
> themselves will interoperate.

Although if this were to be wanted in some use cases, an 'XOXO format'
could be defined.  I have suggested some possibilities at
<http://blogxoxo.blogspot.com/2000/01/tags.html?tags=xoxo+format> and
have considered the concept of extending uF with XOXO at
<http://blogxoxo.blogspot.com/2006/02/how-can-xoxo-be-used.html>