[uf-discuss] Visible Data...a Microformat requirement?

Thu Oct 26 01:19:44 PDT 2006

>> just a discouraged usage 

You are recommending a discouraged usages?

>> cardinal sin 

Is this a pragmatic group that I'm working with, or a bunch of religious
zealots that I've managed to get entangle with?

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org
[mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of Ciaran
McNulty
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:15 AM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Visible Data...a Microformat requirement?

On 10/26/06, Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm still not convinced.  I've only heard generalities and no 
> specifics on anything I've heard regarding my use-case.  RDF is far to 
> complicated for the average person creating HTML; one reason why I 
> don't think it will ever fly.  I still know of nothing else besides 
> Microformats that can fill this role; can you give me some specifics that:
>
> * Is very simple to add
> * Doesn't require access to <head>
> * Can be done today

<a rel="bookmark" href="[whatever]"></a>  kind of does what you're talking
about, and it's probably just a discouraged usage rather than a cardinal sin
against microformats.

-Ciaran McNulty
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss at microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss