[uf-discuss] Visible Data...a Microformat requirement?

[Mike Schinkel]

>> Because it hasn't gone through the (fairly rigorous) demands of the uF
process -- the process page on the wiki[1] outlines this.

But what I'm hearing is that if it's not visible it cannot go through that
process...

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org
[mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of Colin
Barrett
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:38 PM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Visible Data...a Microformat requirement?


On Oct 26, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:

> In message <ECE2E018-7D8E-4D9F-B73C-81C4D23E14F3 at opendarwin.org>, Dr.
> Ernie Prabhakar <drernie at opendarwin.org> writes
>
>> As long as you don't  call it a microformat, feel free to experiment.
>> :-)
>
> Why shouldn't he call it a microformat?
>

Because it hasn't gone through the (fairly rigorous) demands of the uF
process -- the process page on the wiki[1] outlines this.

-Colin

[1] http://microformats.org/wiki/process

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss at microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss