[uf-discuss] vote-for

[Scott Reynen]

On Oct 31, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Siegfried Gipp wrote:

>>> 1. The link points to a resource which votes for THIS resource or
>>> contains
>>> some form or script or whatever to enable the user to vote for THIS
>>> resource,
>>> then the usage of the rev attribute is correct.
>>
>> This is out of scope for vote-links.
> I don't see, why. That's just a matter of definition.

Definition is important.  I think there are two distinct ideas here:

1) Page A is a vote for Page B, i.e. a ballot
2) Page A is a place where you can create a vote for Page B, i.e. a  
polling place

Using the same semantics for both is like saying a ballot and a  
polling place are functionally the same thing.  Sure, both are part  
of voting, but that doesn't make them interchangeable.

Peace,
Scott