[uf-discuss] 'currency' microformat straw-man proposal.

[Andy Mabbett]

In message <C1371E3D.7B59F%tantek at cs.stanford.edu>, Tantek Çelik
<tantek at cs.stanford.edu> writes

>On 9/20/06 3:51 PM, "Andy Mabbett" <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>
>>> I see that you documented some examples on the "currency" page on the
>>> wiki.
>>>
>>> Others have mentioned existing currency formats on this thread.
>>>
>>> Could you please create the following pages and fill them out?
>>>
>>> http://microformats.org/wiki/currency-examples
>>>
>>> http://microformats.org/wiki/currency-formats
>>>
>>> Per the process, researching and documenting *-examples and *-formats
>>> are a required prerequisite before bothering to discuss any
>>> brainstorming or proposals.
>>>
>>> Otherwise the discussions of brainstorming will tend to reflect bias
>>> and matters of taste rather than actual market/development
>>> requirements.
>>
>> I find your tone objectionable;
>
>Andy, the tone is short and straightforward to get things done.  Nothing
>more, nothing less.

No. You're not in a position to stipulate "requirements" (much less
"required prerequisites" (sic)) of me, and your insinuations of bias are
unfounded.

>> and your claims fallacious.
>
>I see that there is a "currency-examples" page

Indeed.

>However, there is no currency-formats page.

I didn't say that there was.

> http://microformats.org/wiki/currency-formats
>
>Please re-read the process and follow it accordingly.

I've read the process, and your claims about it are fallacious.

> We have the process
>for a reason (many reasons). If you want to question the process that's a
>separate discussion, otherwise please follow it if your intent is to produce
>a microformat.

Your implication that I have failed to do so is again objectionable (as
is, still, your tone), fallacious and unfounded.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
                Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>

                Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>