[uf-discuss] Hatom or hcalendar?
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Fri Mar 23 04:56:36 PST 2007
In message <A784C18B-E57C-4659-9B68-BE8AFC8D2026 at adactio.com>, Jeremy
Keith <jeremy at adactio.com> writes
>So I started editing the template and I hit a snag: I don't have an
>author listed for each entry. Author is required for hAtom. Now, I
>could just put a single hCard somewhere within the hAtom feed and that
>would solve the problem:
>"If the Entry Author is missing, find the Nearest In Parent <address>
>element(s) with class name author and that is/are a valid hCard"
>But I'm not publishing an <address> already and isn't the whole idea
>of microformats that we don't change *what* we're publishing, just add
>more meaning to what we're already publishing?
I can add a "+1" to that. When I came to add hAtom to several pages, for
I had no author on the page. It prompted me to include a footer, with an
hCard, in every age, which itself was a good thing, but that may have
been either desirable nor possible.
Furthermore, if people subscribe to the resultant feed, they don't even
get to see the author details!
Welcome to the world's longest week!
More information about the microformats-discuss