[uf-new] audio-title proposal for haudio

[Joe Andrieu]

> Monday, June 11, 2007 11:55 AM, Martin McEvoy wrote
> On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:22 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
> > I am proposing that we use 'audio-title' and leave it at that. I'll 
> > work this into the haudio proposal at the end of this week unless 
> > there is strong opposition to this proposal.
> 
> I preferred work-title if we are going to invent a new microformat.
> 
> "work-title of an audio recording is a short textual 
> description used to identify the work among interested 
> parties. This is also referred to as the title of the work. 
> This can be the title of a speech, song title, or short 
> description regarding a sound effect."
> 
> At least it's more likely to be re-used in other microformats

Actually, it is quite likely to be used in the work of art uF under discussion.

But I that is actually the problem.  What if I have a speech about a work of art? Or an audio-tour of the Louvre? Embedded
hWorkOfArt in those hAudio now have name conflicts.

Audio is audio, no?

Speech, song, sound effect. "audio-title" seems to fit with all of those, without losing specificity and without overlapping with
other potential "works".

I agree with Scott that solving the embedding problem /generally/ would be preferable.  However, I think audio-title is better than
work-title, both because of overlap and because I think it more accurately addresses the currently scoped problem of marking up a
piece of audio.

-j

--
Joe Andrieu
SwitchBook Software
http://www.switchbook.com
joe at switchbook.com
+1 (805) 705-8651