[uf-new] PROPOSAL: Replace hAudio FN with TITLE

[Ryan King]

On Feb 15, 2008, at 9:42 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
>
>> For my 2¢, I think the ‘audio-title’ route is OK
>
> I agree.  I was just looking back over how we got here on this  
> issue, and I'm afraid it may be largely my fault.  When AUDIO-TITLE  
> was widely accepted, Brian said "what about FN?" and then Manu  
> raised an issue with FN and then I suggested a resolution for that  
> issue, and Manu agreed.  So we moved forward with FN, but in  
> retrospect I think it was a mistake to treat the resolution of one  
> issue with FN as a reason to go with FN over AUDIO-TITLE without  
> ever really comparing the alternatives.  I never saw a problem with  
> AUDIO-TITLE.  I think I just got so into defending FN that I stopped  
> openly considering the alternatives.  Now that I reconsider them, I  
> agree with Ben that AUDIO-TITLE looks OK.

This sounds like a good way forward to me. Any reason why audio-title  
shouldn't be reconsidered?

-ryan