[uf-new] Re: Comment Questions

[Martin McEvoy]

Martin McEvoy wrote:
> Toby A Inkster wrote:
>> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>> Toby A Inkster wrote:
>>>
>>> > What's wrong with simply using hAtom as it is (possibly with the
>>> > addition of Sarven's "in-reply-to" proposal)
[...edit...]
>>> Ok lets re-use hatom terms only this works...
>>>
>>> <div class="hentry">
>>>   <address class="author vcard">
>>>       <span class="entry-title"><a class="url fn" 
>>> href="http://contributor.com/blog/">Contributor</a> said</span>
>>>   </address>
>>>   about <abbr class="updated" title="2008-09-01T14:40:45+01:00">72 
>>> days ago</abbr>,
>>>   <div class="entry-content">
>>>      <p>Hey Great Post</p>
>>>    </div>
>>>   <a rel="bookmark" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
>>> </div>
>>>
>>> Is this proposed mark up acceptable there is a test page here: 
>>> http://weborganics.co.uk/test/test.html
>>>
>>> and the extracted Atom Is here: 
>>> http://transformr.co.uk/hatom/http://weborganics.co.uk/test/test.html
>>>

I have updated the comment brainstorming pages, the Schema[1] strictly 
re-uses hAtom[2] terms

[1] http://microformats.org/wiki/comment-brainstorming#Schema
[2] http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom

Thanks

-- 
Martin McEvoy

http://weborganics.co.uk/