<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://microformats.org/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=ErchiDelta</id>
	<title>Microformats Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://microformats.org/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=ErchiDelta"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://microformats.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/ErchiDelta"/>
	<updated>2026-04-05T20:45:46Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.4</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://microformats.org/wiki/index.php?title=review-brainstorming&amp;diff=35130</id>
		<title>review-brainstorming</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://microformats.org/wiki/index.php?title=review-brainstorming&amp;diff=35130"/>
		<updated>2008-12-16T16:32:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ErchiDelta: trocvar&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;coolotaric&lt;br /&gt;
= Review Brainstorming =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been several efforts to define data formats for posting &amp;quot;reviews&amp;quot; of products, services etc. on the Web.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page serves to document the brainstorming and ideas resulting from analysis of review examples from real world sites for the design of a simple reviews [[microformat]]. -[http://tantek.com/log/ Tantek] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copied from [[reviews-formats]] which itself was contributed from [http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/ReviewsFormats Technorati Developer's Wiki: ReviewsFormats])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tantek Ãelik&lt;br /&gt;
* Niall Kennedy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[review-examples]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[review-formats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[hreview|hReview]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thoughts on a Microformat for a review ==&lt;br /&gt;
Thoughts towards a simple [[microformat]] subset of earlier efforts, sufficient to express 80/20 of real world review examples on the Web.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Common review fields ===&lt;br /&gt;
* item&lt;br /&gt;
** optional:type of item (business, Web page/site, product, event, person, place, file, text)&lt;br /&gt;
** name/title of item being reviewed (string | [&amp;quot;hCard&amp;quot;] if business or person)&lt;br /&gt;
*** optional:URL (all additional information should be somewhere else, not in the review itself)&lt;br /&gt;
*** optional:image (URL)&lt;br /&gt;
* reviewer ([&amp;quot;hCard&amp;quot;]|name|email|URL)&lt;br /&gt;
* review publication/authoring date (ISO8601 datetime)&lt;br /&gt;
* rating 1 to 5 (default max = 5, default min = 1)&lt;br /&gt;
* optional:tags (keyword,rating)*&lt;br /&gt;
* optional:comments (string)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[hreview|hReview]] for the result and evolution of these thoughts on a microformat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[hreview-brainstorming|hReview brainstorming]] for iteration and brainstorming on hReview itself.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ErchiDelta</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>