Microformats Wiki - User contributions [en]

html5-profile-issues

2010-02-20T14:44:17Z

Krzysztof Maczyński: grammatical correction

<entry-title>HTML5 profile attribute issues </entry-title>
__TOC__
These are externally raised issues about the [[html5-profile|HTML5 Profile Attribute]] with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues are REJECTED for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be ACCEPTED and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec.

'''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[html5-profile-faq|HTML5 Profile Attribute FAQ]] and the [[html5-profile-issues-resolved|HTML5 Profile Attribute resolved issues]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered.

Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — [[User:Tantek|Tantek]]

== closed issues ==
See: [[html5-profile-issues-closed]]

== resolved issues ==
See: [[html5-profile-issues-resolved]]

== issues ==
<span id="Issues">Please add new issues</span> to the '''bottom''' of the list below by copy and pasting the [[#template|template]]. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.

===2010===
* Copyright statement - 2010-02-19

This is a request for clarification.

This document is in the public domain. If the W3C HTML Working Group accepts to take on the proposal as a deliverable, should contributions from the Working Group participants expected to be in the public domain as well, or can they remain under the W3C Document license? As owner of [http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/29 ACTION-29] in the WG, I'm interested in gathering rationals in both approaches. -PLH.
<div class="hentry">
{{OpenIssue}}
<span class="entry-summary author vcard">
<span class="published">2010-02-20</span>
raised by <span class="fn">Krzysztof Maczyński</span>
</span>
<div class="entry-content discussion issues">
* <strong class="entry-title">Should sections 2 and 3 be normative?</strong>
The [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0683.html message announcing the draft] indicates that sections 2 (“listing known HTML 4.01 errata regarding the profile attribute on the head element”) and 3 (“describing how this specification could be applied to both previous versions of HTML and XHTML, and other markup languages”) would be informative. I propose that the HTML WG consider making them normative.
** other [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0685.html relevant] [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0690.html messages]
</div>
</div>

== template ==
{{issues-format}}

== related pages ==
* [[html5-profile]]
* [[html5]]
* [[xmdp]]

html5-profile-issues

2010-02-20T14:41:38Z

Krzysztof Maczyński: status of sections 2 and 3

<entry-title>HTML5 profile attribute issues </entry-title>
__TOC__
These are externally raised issues about the [[html5-profile|HTML5 Profile Attribute]] with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues are REJECTED for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be ACCEPTED and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec.

'''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[html5-profile-faq|HTML5 Profile Attribute FAQ]] and the [[html5-profile-issues-resolved|HTML5 Profile Attribute resolved issues]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered.

Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — [[User:Tantek|Tantek]]

== closed issues ==
See: [[html5-profile-issues-closed]]

== resolved issues ==
See: [[html5-profile-issues-resolved]]

== issues ==
<span id="Issues">Please add new issues</span> to the '''bottom''' of the list below by copy and pasting the [[#template|template]]. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.

===2010===
* Copyright statement - 2010-02-19

This is a request for clarification.

This document is in the public domain. If the W3C HTML Working Group accepts to take on the proposal as a deliverable, should contributions from the Working Group participants expected to be in the public domain as well, or can they remain under the W3C Document license? As owner of [http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/29 ACTION-29] in the WG, I'm interested in gathering rationals in both approaches. -PLH.
<div class="hentry">
{{OpenIssue}}
<span class="entry-summary author vcard">
<span class="published">2010-02-20</span>
raised by <span class="fn">Krzysztof Maczyński</span>
</span>
<div class="entry-content discussion issues">
* <strong class="entry-title">Should sections 2 and 3 be normative?</strong>
The [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0683.html message announcing the draft] indicates that sections 2 (“listing known HTML 4.01 errata regarding the profile attribute on the head element”) and 3 (“describing how this specification could be applied to both previous versions of HTML and XHTML, and other markup languages”) would be informative. I propose that the HTML WG considers making them normative.
** other [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0685.html relevant] [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0690.html messages]
</div>
</div>

== template ==
{{issues-format}}

== related pages ==
* [[html5-profile]]
* [[html5]]
* [[xmdp]]