aggregate-review-examples - Revision history

Tantek: Reverted edits by Jlhoyd05 (Talk) to last version by Kavi

2010-09-11T20:34:08Z

Reverted edits by Jlhoyd05 (Talk) to last version by Kavi

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 11 September 2010
Line 250:		Line 250:
	* [[hreview\|hReview]]		* [[hreview\|hReview]]
	* ''Normative references for tags used''		* ''Normative references for tags used''

	~~==Related Links==~~

	~~[http://www.unbeatable.co.uk/pages/Electronics/TV-and-Video/Flat-Panel-Televisions/ '''lcd tv''']~~

Jlhoyd05: /* See Also */

2010-09-11T18:03:36Z

Kavi: /* Ratings without reviews examples */

2009-11-21T02:54:08Z

Ratings without reviews examples

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:54, 21 November 2009
Line 75:		Line 75:
	* http://www.urbanspoon.com/r/3/39999/restaurant/West-Village/Spotted-Pig-New-York		* http://www.urbanspoon.com/r/3/39999/restaurant/West-Village/Spotted-Pig-New-York
	* Urbanspoon explicitly writes the number of user ratings as well as the number of reviews (though the review count is less prominent on the page). Urbanspoon uses a binary scale (like it/don't like it) and uses the term "votes."		* Urbanspoon explicitly writes the number of user ratings as well as the number of reviews (though the review count is less prominent on the page). Urbanspoon uses a binary scale (like it/don't like it) and uses the term "votes."

			Overall, "votes" seems to be the most common term used for the number of user ratings when provided without reviews. This is true even when the rating scale is not binary (i.e. 5-point scale or 10-point scale), though the term "ratings" is also used commonly.

	== Coded examples ==		== Coded examples ==

Kavi: /* Ratings without reviews examples */

2009-11-21T02:51:06Z

Ratings without reviews examples

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 21 November 2009
Line 55:		Line 55:
	* http://www.download.com/Ad-Aware-2008/3000-8022_4-10045910.html		* http://www.download.com/Ad-Aware-2008/3000-8022_4-10045910.html
	* Download.com explicitly specifies the number of user ratings as well as the number of reviews (though the review count is less prominent). Ratings are on a 5-point scale and Download.com uses the term "votes."		* Download.com explicitly specifies the number of user ratings as well as the number of reviews (though the review count is less prominent). Ratings are on a 5-point scale and Download.com uses the term "votes."

			=== Gamespot ===
			* http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/rpg/masseffect/index.html
			* Gamespot uses both "reviews" and "votes" in their aggregate reviews. In the Critic Score section, they show the number of reviews, whereas in the User Score section they show "votes." If you click through on the votes link, you can see the number of player reviews (which, as expected, is much lower than the number of player reviews).

			=== IGN ===
			* http://xbox360.ign.com/objects/718/718963.html
			* IGN shows the number of user ratings but not the number of reviews. Ratings are on a 10-point scale, and they use the term "ratings."

	=== IMDb ===		=== IMDb ===
Line 66:		Line 74:
	=== Urbanspoon ===		=== Urbanspoon ===
	* http://www.urbanspoon.com/r/3/39999/restaurant/West-Village/Spotted-Pig-New-York		* http://www.urbanspoon.com/r/3/39999/restaurant/West-Village/Spotted-Pig-New-York
	* Urbanspoon explicitly writes the number of user ratings as well as the number of reviews (though the review count is less prominent on the page). Urbanspoon uses ~~the term "votes" and votes are~~ binary (like it/don't like it).		* Urbanspoon explicitly writes the number of user ratings as well as the number of reviews (though the review count is less prominent on the page). Urbanspoon uses a binary scale (like it/don't like it) and uses the term "votes."



	== Coded examples ==		== Coded examples ==

Kavi at 02:20, 21 November 2009

2009-11-21T02:20:29Z

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 * Also includes number of reviews for each score (1-5)
 * The site highlights recurring themes from reviews (i.e. "The food is delicious - love the chicken mole.") and the number of reviews where such comments were made.
@@ Line 203: / Line 226: @@
 * ''Summary of common patterns discovered''
 * ''Other attempts to solve The Problem''
 == Proposal ==
 * Early drafts
@@ Line 210: / Line 234: @@
 ** - proposal
 ** -microformat
 == See Also ==
 * Aggregation of microformats: [[aggregate-microformat-template-examples|examples]] - [[aggregate-microformat-template-formats|formats]] - [[aggregate-microformat-template-brainstorming|brainstorming]]

Tantek: added link to hreview-aggregate draft stub

2009-05-18T07:56:21Z

added link to hreview-aggregate draft stub

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:56, 18 May 2009
Line 213:		Line 213:
	* Aggregation of microformats: [[aggregate-microformat-template-examples\|examples]] - [[aggregate-microformat-template-formats\|formats]] - [[aggregate-microformat-template-brainstorming\|brainstorming]]		* Aggregation of microformats: [[aggregate-microformat-template-examples\|examples]] - [[aggregate-microformat-template-formats\|formats]] - [[aggregate-microformat-template-brainstorming\|brainstorming]]
	* Aggregate review: [[aggregate-review-formats\|formats]] - [[aggregate-review-brainstorming\|brainstorming]]		* Aggregate review: [[aggregate-review-formats\|formats]] - [[aggregate-review-brainstorming\|brainstorming]]
			* [[hreview-aggregate]]
	* [[review-examples]] for examples of individual reviews		* [[review-examples]] for examples of individual reviews
	* [[hreview\|hReview]]		* [[hreview\|hReview]]
	* ''Normative references for tags used''		* ''Normative references for tags used''

Kavi at 17:38, 6 April 2009

2009-04-06T17:38:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 6 April 2009
Line 211:		Line 211:
	** -microformat		** -microformat
	== See Also ==		== See Also ==
			* Aggregation of microformats: [[aggregate-microformat-template-examples\|examples]] - [[aggregate-microformat-template-formats\|formats]] - [[aggregate-microformat-template-brainstorming\|brainstorming]]
	* Aggregate review: [[aggregate-review-formats\|formats]] - [[aggregate-review-brainstorming\|brainstorming]]		* Aggregate review: [[aggregate-review-formats\|formats]] - [[aggregate-review-brainstorming\|brainstorming]]
	* [[review-examples]] for examples of individual reviews		* [[review-examples]] for examples of individual reviews
	* [[hreview\|hReview]]		* [[hreview\|hReview]]
	* ''Normative references for tags used''		* ''Normative references for tags used''

JayMyers: adding aggregate example with hproduct, hlisting, haudio

2009-03-09T18:35:34Z

adding aggregate example with hproduct, hlisting, haudio

@@ Line 152: / Line 152: @@
 				</dl>
 			</li>
 	</div>
 </div>

JayMyers: adding another aggregate example

2009-03-09T18:34:30Z

adding another aggregate example

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 9 March 2009
Line 108:		Line 108:
	</nowiki></pre>		</nowiki></pre>

			=== hlisting, hproduct, haggregatereview/hreview, xoxo ===

			<pre><nowiki>
			<div class="hlisting">
			<div class="hproduct">
			<ol>
			<li class="lister"><a href="http://storename.com">Store name</a></li>
			<li class="category"><a href="http://storename.com/tv-and-video">TV & Video</a></li>
			<li class="category"><a href="http://storename.com/televisions">Televisions</a></li>
			<li>Product Info</li>
			</ol>
			<img src="http://images.storename.com/products/samsung-ln40a550.jpg" class="photo" alt="picture of samsung ln40a550" />
			<div class="fn"><span class="brand">Samsung</span> - 40" 1080p Flat-Panel LCD HDTV</div>
			<dl class="identifier">
			<dt>Model</dt>
			<dd>LN40A550</dd>
			<dt>SKU</dt>
			<dd>8749465</dd>
			</dl>
			<div class="haggregatereview">
			<div class="hreview">
			<span class="fn"><a href="http://storename.com/path/to/product" class="url"><img src="http://images.storename.com/images/misc/ratings_star_3_5.gif" alt="3.5 out of 5 stars"/></a></span><span class="rating">4.7</span> / <span class="best">5</span> (<span class="num">13</span> reviews)</div>
			</div>
			</div>
			<div class="price">$1,099.99</div>
			<ol class="xoxo">
			<li><h2>Specifications</h2>
			<dl>
			<dt>Warranty Terms - Parts</dt>
			<dd>1 year</dd>
			<dt>Warranty Terms - Labor</dt>
			<dd>1 year</dd>
			<dt>Product Height</dt>
			<dd>27" with stand (24-7/10" without)</dd>
			<dt>Product Width</dt>
			<dd>39-1/5"</dd>
			<dt>Product Weight</dt>
			<dd>61.5 lbs. with stand (54.5 lbs. without)</dd>
			<dt>Product Depth</dt>
			<dd>11-4/5" with stand (3-3/5" without)</dd>
			<dt>TV Type</dt>
			<dd>LCD Flat-Panel</dd>
			</dl>
			</li>
			</div>
			</div>
			</nowiki></pre>

	== Existing Practices ==		== Existing Practices ==

JayMyers: adding me, jay, to participants list

2009-03-09T18:33:26Z

adding me, jay, to participants list

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 9 March 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* John Panzer		* John Panzer
	* Kavi Goel		* Kavi Goel
			* Jay Myers

	== Real-World Examples ==		== Real-World Examples ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 11 September 2010
Line 250:		Line 250:
	* [[hreview\|hReview]]		* [[hreview\|hReview]]
	* ''Normative references for tags used''		* ''Normative references for tags used''

			==Related Links==

			[http://www.unbeatable.co.uk/pages/Electronics/TV-and-Video/Flat-Panel-Televisions/ '''lcd tv''']