directory-inclusion-brainstorming - Revision history

RyanKing: Reverted edits by EroudOmget (Talk) to last version by Brian

2008-12-29T17:00:14Z

Reverted edits by EroudOmget (Talk) to last version by Brian

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 29 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~oloelde~~
	=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=		=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=
	This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examples]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].		This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examples]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].
Line 8:		Line 7:
	== Authors ==		== Authors ==
	* [http://theryanking.com/ Ryan King]		* [http://theryanking.com/ Ryan King]
	* [http://tantek.com/ Tantek ~~Ãelik~~]		* [http://tantek.com/ Tantek Çelik]

	==Questions==		==Questions==

EroudOmget: bocgetv

2008-12-29T02:44:03Z

bocgetv

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 29 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			oloelde
	=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=		=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=
	This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examples]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].		This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examples]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].
Line 7:		Line 8:
	== Authors ==		== Authors ==
	* [http://theryanking.com/ Ryan King]		* [http://theryanking.com/ Ryan King]
	* [http://tantek.com/ Tantek ~~Çelik~~]		* [http://tantek.com/ Tantek Ãelik]

	==Questions==		==Questions==

Brian: Reverted edits by MonacElvar (Talk) to last version by DavidForrest

2008-12-20T18:48:24Z

Reverted edits by MonacElvar (Talk) to last version by DavidForrest

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 20 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~c4trocnava~~
	=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=		=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=
	This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examples]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].		This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examples]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].
Line 8:		Line 7:
	== Authors ==		== Authors ==
	* [http://theryanking.com/ Ryan King]		* [http://theryanking.com/ Ryan King]
	* [http://tantek.com/ Tantek ~~Ãelik~~]		* [http://tantek.com/ Tantek Çelik]

	==Questions==		==Questions==

MonacElvar: liracletod

2008-12-19T22:40:20Z

liracletod

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 19 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			c4trocnava
	=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=		=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=
	This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examples]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].		This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examples]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].
Line 7:		Line 8:
	== Authors ==		== Authors ==
	* [http://theryanking.com/ Ryan King]		* [http://theryanking.com/ Ryan King]
	* [http://tantek.com/ Tantek ~~Çelik~~]		* [http://tantek.com/ Tantek Ãelik]

	==Questions==		==Questions==

DavidForrest: /* Questions */

2008-10-11T06:26:02Z

Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:26, 11 October 2008
Line 13:		Line 13:
	** Probably not. There's lots of cases where there are preexisting directory links, which are not taggable. It would be nice to have the ability to make those explicit. - Ryan		** Probably not. There's lots of cases where there are preexisting directory links, which are not taggable. It would be nice to have the ability to make those explicit. - Ryan
	** Also, [[rel-tag]] does not require that the page linked to be a directory page... it can also be a definition page -- [[User:Singpolyma\|singpolyma]] 06:07, 20 May 2006 (PDT)		** Also, [[rel-tag]] does not require that the page linked to be a directory page... it can also be a definition page -- [[User:Singpolyma\|singpolyma]] 06:07, 20 May 2006 (PDT)
			* Does it link to a detailed page in the directory that should show a link back to the page, or can it be just directory itself? I'm considering using it for pointing from resources to registries where the resource might be registered.

	== Straw proposal ==		== Straw proposal ==
	* rel="directory" - thoughts by Tantek		* rel="directory" - thoughts by Tantek
	** indicates that the referenced resource is a directory which does or should contain the current page. Note that this has some resemblance to (but with important differences from) several existing [http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#h-6.12 HTML4 rel values]: Contents, ToC, Index, Appendix. A directory implies something more though, perhaps aspects like pointing to a bunch of things at different locations/sites, perhaps one or more canonical orderings (whether alphabetical or by some other metric). I know this is a bit rough, but I ran the idea past a few key folks at FOO Camp (David Weinberger, Josh Kinberg, Blaine & Rabble of ODEO), and after a bit of discussion it seemed to make sense to them too.		** indicates that the referenced resource is a directory which does or should contain the current page. Note that this has some resemblance to (but with important differences from) several existing [http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#h-6.12 HTML4 rel values]: Contents, ToC, Index, Appendix. A directory implies something more though, perhaps aspects like pointing to a bunch of things at different locations/sites, perhaps one or more canonical orderings (whether alphabetical or by some other metric). I know this is a bit rough, but I ran the idea past a few key folks at FOO Camp (David Weinberger, Josh Kinberg, Blaine & Rabble of ODEO), and after a bit of discussion it seemed to make sense to them too.

Singpolyma: /* Questions */

2006-05-20T13:07:01Z

Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, 20 May 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* Is [[rel-tag]] sufficient?		* Is [[rel-tag]] sufficient?
	** Probably not. There's lots of cases where there are preexisting directory links, which are not taggable. It would be nice to have the ability to make those explicit. - Ryan		** Probably not. There's lots of cases where there are preexisting directory links, which are not taggable. It would be nice to have the ability to make those explicit. - Ryan
	** Also, [[rel-tag]] does not require that the page linked to be a directory page... it can also be a definition page		** Also, [[rel-tag]] does not require that the page linked to be a directory page... it can also be a definition page -- [[User:Singpolyma\|singpolyma]] 06:07, 20 May 2006 (PDT)

	== Straw proposal ==		== Straw proposal ==
	* rel="directory" - thoughts by Tantek		* rel="directory" - thoughts by Tantek
	** indicates that the referenced resource is a directory which does or should contain the current page. Note that this has some resemblance to (but with important differences from) several existing [http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#h-6.12 HTML4 rel values]: Contents, ToC, Index, Appendix. A directory implies something more though, perhaps aspects like pointing to a bunch of things at different locations/sites, perhaps one or more canonical orderings (whether alphabetical or by some other metric). I know this is a bit rough, but I ran the idea past a few key folks at FOO Camp (David Weinberger, Josh Kinberg, Blaine & Rabble of ODEO), and after a bit of discussion it seemed to make sense to them too.		** indicates that the referenced resource is a directory which does or should contain the current page. Note that this has some resemblance to (but with important differences from) several existing [http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#h-6.12 HTML4 rel values]: Contents, ToC, Index, Appendix. A directory implies something more though, perhaps aspects like pointing to a bunch of things at different locations/sites, perhaps one or more canonical orderings (whether alphabetical or by some other metric). I know this is a bit rough, but I ran the idea past a few key folks at FOO Camp (David Weinberger, Josh Kinberg, Blaine & Rabble of ODEO), and after a bit of discussion it seemed to make sense to them too.

Singpolyma: /* Questions */

2006-05-20T13:06:50Z

Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:06, 20 May 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* Is [[rel-tag]] sufficient?		* Is [[rel-tag]] sufficient?
	** Probably not. There's lots of cases where there are preexisting directory links, which are not taggable. It would be nice to have the ability to make those explicit. - Ryan		** Probably not. There's lots of cases where there are preexisting directory links, which are not taggable. It would be nice to have the ability to make those explicit. - Ryan
			** Also, [[rel-tag]] does not require that the page linked to be a directory page... it can also be a definition page

	== Straw proposal ==		== Straw proposal ==
	* rel="directory" - thoughts by Tantek		* rel="directory" - thoughts by Tantek
	** indicates that the referenced resource is a directory which does or should contain the current page. Note that this has some resemblance to (but with important differences from) several existing [http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#h-6.12 HTML4 rel values]: Contents, ToC, Index, Appendix. A directory implies something more though, perhaps aspects like pointing to a bunch of things at different locations/sites, perhaps one or more canonical orderings (whether alphabetical or by some other metric). I know this is a bit rough, but I ran the idea past a few key folks at FOO Camp (David Weinberger, Josh Kinberg, Blaine & Rabble of ODEO), and after a bit of discussion it seemed to make sense to them too.		** indicates that the referenced resource is a directory which does or should contain the current page. Note that this has some resemblance to (but with important differences from) several existing [http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#h-6.12 HTML4 rel values]: Contents, ToC, Index, Appendix. A directory implies something more though, perhaps aspects like pointing to a bunch of things at different locations/sites, perhaps one or more canonical orderings (whether alphabetical or by some other metric). I know this is a bit rough, but I ran the idea past a few key folks at FOO Camp (David Weinberger, Josh Kinberg, Blaine & Rabble of ODEO), and after a bit of discussion it seemed to make sense to them too.

Tantek: /* Directory Inclusion Brainstorming */

2005-08-30T14:59:12Z

Directory Inclusion Brainstorming

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 30 August 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=		=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=
	This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-~~examles~~]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].		This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examples]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].

	== Editor ==		== Editor ==

Tantek: /* Directory Inclusion Brainstorming */

2005-08-30T14:59:01Z

Directory Inclusion Brainstorming

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 30 August 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=		=Directory Inclusion Brainstorming=
	This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion.		This page is dedicated to brainstorming ways to do distributed directory inclusion, based on the research done in [[directory-inclusion-examles]] and [[directory-inclusion-formats]].

	== Editor ==		== Editor ==

Tantek: /* Straw proposal */

2005-08-30T05:44:08Z

Straw proposal

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 30 August 2005
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Straw proposal ==		== Straw proposal ==
	* rel="directory" - thoughts by Tantek		* rel="directory" - thoughts by Tantek
	** indicates that the referenced resource is a directory which does or should contain the current page. Note that this has some resemblance to (but with important differences from) several existing [http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#h-6.12 HTML4 rel values]: Contents, ToC, Index, Appendix. A directory implies something more though, perhaps aspects like pointing to a bunch of things at different locations/sites, perhaps one or more canonical orderings (whether alphabetical or by some other metric).		** indicates that the referenced resource is a directory which does or should contain the current page. Note that this has some resemblance to (but with important differences from) several existing [http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#h-6.12 HTML4 rel values]: Contents, ToC, Index, Appendix. A directory implies something more though, perhaps aspects like pointing to a bunch of things at different locations/sites, perhaps one or more canonical orderings (whether alphabetical or by some other metric). I know this is a bit rough, but I ran the idea past a few key folks at FOO Camp (David Weinberger, Josh Kinberg, Blaine & Rabble of ODEO), and after a bit of discussion it seemed to make sense to them too.