governance-issues - Revision history

Tantek: fix deadname

2018-06-21T00:46:51Z

fix deadname

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 21 June 2018
Line 105:		Line 105:
	*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]		*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]
	*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]		*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]
	*+0 ~~[[User:EdwardOConnor\|Edward~~ O'Connor]] - I think the existing Microformats governance is benevolent, transparent, and follows due process. Which is to say that, while I agree with the principles described in this petition, I believe the status quo satisfies those same principles.		*+0 Theresa O'Connor - I think the existing Microformats governance is benevolent, transparent, and follows due process. Which is to say that, while I agree with the principles described in this petition, I believe the status quo satisfies those same principles.
	*+1 [[User:JesseRodgers\|Jesse Rodgers]] - Not sure if status quo is a good idea, some structure might help... certainly worth a serious discussion.		*+1 [[User:JesseRodgers\|Jesse Rodgers]] - Not sure if status quo is a good idea, some structure might help... certainly worth a serious discussion.

2013-04-07T04:51:50Z

Reverted edits by ABIDEEN10 (Talk) to last version by Tantek

2013-04-07T03:58:08Z

2011-10-27T00:44:56Z

note page largely out of date, issues larglely long resolved, remaining work is mostly admin to-do/documentation

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:44, 27 October 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="usermessage">
			'''This page is largely out of date, and most of the issues have been addressed with the creation of the [[admins]] page and related pages (e.g. [[admin-faq]]).'''

			'''[[to-do]]: [[admins]] should process this page for additional specific outstanding issues, distill them accordingly, archive them by year, and document necessary [[admin-faq\|FAQs]] accordingly.'''

			[[User:Tantek\|Tantek]] 00:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
			</div>

	== Issue Summary 2007-02-28 ==		== Issue Summary 2007-02-28 ==
	=== Editor ===		=== Editor ===
Line 12:		Line 20:

	== Preamble ==		== Preamble ==
	Over the last year, a few people (AndyMabbett, JoeAndrieu, ErnestPrabhakar, JamesCraig, [[User:ManuSporny\|ManuSporny]]) have raised issues about how the Microformats wiki, mailing list, and community are governed. This page is here to discuss ideas for documenting, formalizing, and/or improving our collective governance.		Over the last year (2007), a few people (AndyMabbett, JoeAndrieu, ErnestPrabhakar, JamesCraig, [[User:ManuSporny\|ManuSporny]]) have raised issues about how the Microformats wiki, mailing list, and community are governed. This page is here to discuss ideas for documenting, formalizing, and/or improving our collective governance.

	== Abstract ==		== Abstract ==

2009-01-06T19:52:56Z

Reverted edits by OreltAtrle (Talk) to last version by JesseRodgers

2009-01-06T16:45:04Z

boceltchia

2008-03-18T12:11:48Z

Petition

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:11, 18 March 2008
Line 98:		Line 98:
	*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]		*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]
	*+0 [[User:EdwardOConnor\|Edward O'Connor]] - I think the existing Microformats governance is benevolent, transparent, and follows due process. Which is to say that, while I agree with the principles described in this petition, I believe the status quo satisfies those same principles.		*+0 [[User:EdwardOConnor\|Edward O'Connor]] - I think the existing Microformats governance is benevolent, transparent, and follows due process. Which is to say that, while I agree with the principles described in this petition, I believe the status quo satisfies those same principles.
			*+1 [[User:JesseRodgers\|Jesse Rodgers]] - Not sure if status quo is a good idea, some structure might help... certainly worth a serious discussion.

	== Resources ==		== Resources ==

2008-03-13T00:53:25Z

Petition: fixed signature

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 13 March 2008
Line 97:		Line 97:
	*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]		*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]
	*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]		*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]
	*+0 [[User:EdwardOConnor Edward O'Connor]] - I think the existing Microformats governance is benevolent, transparent, and follows due process. Which is to say that, while I agree with the principles described in this petition, I believe the status quo satisfies those same principles.		*+0 [[User:EdwardOConnor\|Edward O'Connor]] - I think the existing Microformats governance is benevolent, transparent, and follows due process. Which is to say that, while I agree with the principles described in this petition, I believe the status quo satisfies those same principles.

	== Resources ==		== Resources ==

2008-03-13T00:53:01Z

Petition: +0

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 13 March 2008
Line 97:		Line 97:
	*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]		*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]
	*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]		*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]
			*+0 [[User:EdwardOConnor Edward O'Connor]] - I think the existing Microformats governance is benevolent, transparent, and follows due process. Which is to say that, while I agree with the principles described in this petition, I believe the status quo satisfies those same principles.

	== Resources ==		== Resources ==

2008-03-11T23:36:01Z

Petition

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 11 March 2008
Line 96:		Line 96:
	*+1 [[User:TomMorris\|Tom Morris]] - I do not think the current admins are doing a bad job, but would appreciate greater transparency by providing clear reasons for all administrative actions. I also think that unless group administration is transparent, Bad Things Can Happen.		*+1 [[User:TomMorris\|Tom Morris]] - I do not think the current admins are doing a bad job, but would appreciate greater transparency by providing clear reasons for all administrative actions. I also think that unless group administration is transparent, Bad Things Can Happen.
	*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]		*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]
			*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]

	== Resources ==		== Resources ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 21 June 2018
Line 105:		Line 105:
	*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]		*+1 [[User:JeffMcNeill\|Jeff McNeill]]
	*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]		*+1 [[User:RobManson\|Rob Manson]]
	*+0 ~~[[User:EdwardOConnor\|Edward~~ O'Connor]] - I think the existing Microformats governance is benevolent, transparent, and follows due process. Which is to say that, while I agree with the principles described in this petition, I believe the status quo satisfies those same principles.		*+0 Theresa O'Connor - I think the existing Microformats governance is benevolent, transparent, and follows due process. Which is to say that, while I agree with the principles described in this petition, I believe the status quo satisfies those same principles.
	*+1 [[User:JesseRodgers\|Jesse Rodgers]] - Not sure if status quo is a good idea, some structure might help... certainly worth a serious discussion.		*+1 [[User:JesseRodgers\|Jesse Rodgers]] - Not sure if status quo is a good idea, some structure might help... certainly worth a serious discussion.