grouping-brainstorming - Revision history

Brian: Reverted edits by AcelvArlet (Talk) to last version by Brian

2009-01-06T08:07:16Z

Reverted edits by AcelvArlet (Talk) to last version by Brian

2009-01-06T02:36:57Z

rolrora

2008-12-20T22:12:58Z

Reverted edits by PasorVarpa (Talk) to last version by ManuSporny

2008-12-20T03:45:22Z

cabaslala

2007-05-22T16:00:06Z

Option 7: id-class grouping

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 22 May 2007
Line 189:		Line 189:

	== Option 7: id-class grouping ==		== Option 7: id-class grouping ==

			This problem solution proposal was put forward by Chris Griego:

	<span id="internal-event" class="hset vcalendar">Internal</span>		<span id="internal-event" class="hset vcalendar">Internal</span>

2007-05-22T15:48:02Z

Option 7: id-class grouping

@@ Line 187: / Line 187: @@
 * This would lead to an explosion in uF class names: album, speech, podcast, audio-track, speech-section, podcast-part, video, video-clip, geo-set, waypoint, etc.
 * Due to the explosion in class names, it would be difficult for web developers to remember every method of grouping.
 = Possible Uses =

2007-05-15T04:31:14Z

Option 4: id-class grouping with anchors

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:31, 15 May 2007
Line 129:		Line 129:
	</div>		</div>
	</pre>		</pre>

			Pro:
			* Supports all types of grouping

			Con:
			* Anchors are used, displaying links that may confuse the person that is browsing.
			* Using IDs are not very microformatty and only support one ID.

	== Option 5: class-based grouping with keywords ==		== Option 5: class-based grouping with keywords ==

2007-05-15T04:18:40Z

Option 5: class-based grouping with keywords

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:18, 15 May 2007
Line 151:		Line 151:
	Cons:		Cons:
	* Needs the concept of keywords.		* Needs the concept of keywords.
	* More verbose than is needed.		* More verbose than is needed. [[User:ManuSporny\|ManuSporny]] 21:18, 14 May 2007 (PDT)
	* Difficult to recognize if something is a grouping member until reading the entire identifier.		* Difficult to recognize if something is a grouping member until reading the entire identifier. [[User:ManuSporny\|ManuSporny]] 21:18, 14 May 2007 (PDT)

	== Option 6: per-microformat grouping ==		== Option 6: per-microformat grouping ==

2007-05-15T04:17:38Z

Option 5: class-based grouping with keywords

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:17, 15 May 2007
Line 148:		Line 148:
	* Is subject-agnostic - this approach can be used for any type of grouping where one item is contained by another.		* Is subject-agnostic - this approach can be used for any type of grouping where one item is contained by another.
	* Works for N-N relationships, ie: class="album.member soundtrack1.member soundtrack2.member".		* Works for N-N relationships, ie: class="album.member soundtrack1.member soundtrack2.member".

			Cons:
			* Needs the concept of keywords.
			* More verbose than is needed.
			* Difficult to recognize if something is a grouping member until reading the entire identifier.

	== Option 6: per-microformat grouping ==		== Option 6: per-microformat grouping ==

2007-05-02T13:34:59Z

Contributors