hreview-faq - Revision history

Barnabywalters at 16:42, 16 February 2022

2022-02-16T16:42:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 16 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= hReview FAQ =		= hReview FAQ =

	This page is for documenting Q&A about [[hreview\|hReview]]. If you have a new question to ask, Please consider first asking your question on the [~~irc~~://irc.~~freenode~~.~~net~~/#microformats microformats irc channel] (preferably) or the [http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss/ microformats-discuss] list.		This page is for documenting Q&A about [[hreview\|hReview]]. If you have a new question to ask, Please consider first asking your question on the [ircs://irc.libera.chat:6697/microformats microformats irc channel] (preferably) or the [http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss/ microformats-discuss] list.

	== Q&A ==		== Q&A ==

Tantek: Reverted edits by ABIDEEN10 (Talk) to last version by Tantek

2013-04-07T04:58:02Z

Reverted edits by ABIDEEN10 (Talk) to last version by Tantek

Show changes

ABIDEEN10 at 02:48, 7 April 2013

2013-04-07T02:48:08Z

Show changes

Tantek: Protected "hreview-faq" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop]

2013-04-04T00:53:14Z

Protected "hreview-faq" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop]

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:53, 4 April 2013
(No difference)

Tantek: Reverted edits by ABIDEEN1 (Talk) to last version by TomMorris

2013-04-04T00:48:11Z

Reverted edits by ABIDEEN1 (Talk) to last version by TomMorris

Show changes

ABIDEEN1 at 00:09, 4 April 2013

2013-04-04T00:09:13Z

Show changes

TomMorris: Reverted edits by Johnclarke (Talk) to last version by Dfrankow

2013-04-03T14:50:39Z

Reverted edits by Johnclarke (Talk) to last version by Dfrankow

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 3 April 2013
Line 38:		Line 38:
	#* Possibly use the object inclusion method from [[resume-brainstorming]].		#* Possibly use the object inclusion method from [[resume-brainstorming]].
	# ''For a music review, is there a standard for designating/tagging the Artist name separate from the Album name or Track name etc?''		# ''For a music review, is there a standard for designating/tagging the Artist name separate from the Album name or Track name etc?''
	#* It depends on what specifically you are reviewing. If you are reviewing the Artist as a whole, then the Artist is the item. If you are reviewing a specific Album, then the Album is the item. If you are reviewing a particular Track, then the Track is the item. You can then just use tags for the rest of the information. ~~http://www.e-textloans.co.uk/~~		#* It depends on what specifically you are reviewing. If you are reviewing the Artist as a whole, then the Artist is the item. If you are reviewing a specific Album, then the Album is the item. If you are reviewing a particular Track, then the Track is the item. You can then just use tags for the rest of the information.

	#*# ''Is there a standard way of specifying what the tag is addressing semantically? That is, say I were reviewing the album OK Computer from Radiohead - the item is of course OK Computer - and I can have a tag to Radiohead - but is there an accepted practice as marking it as an "artist" tag?''		#*# ''Is there a standard way of specifying what the tag is addressing semantically? That is, say I were reviewing the album OK Computer from Radiohead - the item is of course OK Computer - and I can have a tag to Radiohead - but is there an accepted practice as marking it as an "artist" tag?''
	## The short answer is no, tags are a relatively flat set of "aspects" of the item, and you can't give tags a "type" like that. The longer answer is, you could tag it Radiohead using a tagspace (see [[rel-tag]] for details) that specifically defined Radiohead as an artist, e.g. perhaps the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiohead Wikipedia page for Radiohead].		## The short answer is no, tags are a relatively flat set of "aspects" of the item, and you can't give tags a "type" like that. The longer answer is, you could tag it Radiohead using a tagspace (see [[rel-tag]] for details) that specifically defined Radiohead as an artist, e.g. perhaps the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiohead Wikipedia page for Radiohead].

Johnclarke: /* Q&A */

2013-04-03T14:32:12Z

Q&A

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 3 April 2013
Line 38:		Line 38:
	#* Possibly use the object inclusion method from [[resume-brainstorming]].		#* Possibly use the object inclusion method from [[resume-brainstorming]].
	# ''For a music review, is there a standard for designating/tagging the Artist name separate from the Album name or Track name etc?''		# ''For a music review, is there a standard for designating/tagging the Artist name separate from the Album name or Track name etc?''
	#* It depends on what specifically you are reviewing. If you are reviewing the Artist as a whole, then the Artist is the item. If you are reviewing a specific Album, then the Album is the item. If you are reviewing a particular Track, then the Track is the item. You can then just use tags for the rest of the information.		#* It depends on what specifically you are reviewing. If you are reviewing the Artist as a whole, then the Artist is the item. If you are reviewing a specific Album, then the Album is the item. If you are reviewing a particular Track, then the Track is the item. You can then just use tags for the rest of the information. http://www.e-textloans.co.uk/

	#*# ''Is there a standard way of specifying what the tag is addressing semantically? That is, say I were reviewing the album OK Computer from Radiohead - the item is of course OK Computer - and I can have a tag to Radiohead - but is there an accepted practice as marking it as an "artist" tag?''		#*# ''Is there a standard way of specifying what the tag is addressing semantically? That is, say I were reviewing the album OK Computer from Radiohead - the item is of course OK Computer - and I can have a tag to Radiohead - but is there an accepted practice as marking it as an "artist" tag?''
	## The short answer is no, tags are a relatively flat set of "aspects" of the item, and you can't give tags a "type" like that. The longer answer is, you could tag it Radiohead using a tagspace (see [[rel-tag]] for details) that specifically defined Radiohead as an artist, e.g. perhaps the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiohead Wikipedia page for Radiohead].		## The short answer is no, tags are a relatively flat set of "aspects" of the item, and you can't give tags a "type" like that. The longer answer is, you could tag it Radiohead using a tagspace (see [[rel-tag]] for details) that specifically defined Radiohead as an artist, e.g. perhaps the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiohead Wikipedia page for Radiohead].

Dfrankow: /* Q&A */ Add the important questions because no one was on the IRC channel

2009-02-06T04:34:13Z

Q&A: Add the important questions because no one was on the IRC channel

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:34, 6 February 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	== Q&A ==		== Q&A ==

			# What is the purpose of the hReview microformat (i.e. why is it important for it to exist)?

			# What are the advantages of using the hReview microformat?

	# ''How do you specify more detail for the 'type' field, e.g. for an item of type "product" that is a book, or a movie (on DVD or in a theater), or a music CD? -- paraphrased from [[User:Dougal Campbell\|Dougal Campbell]] 11:54, 21 Jun 2005 (PDT)''		# ''How do you specify more detail for the 'type' field, e.g. for an item of type "product" that is a book, or a movie (on DVD or in a theater), or a music CD? -- paraphrased from [[User:Dougal Campbell\|Dougal Campbell]] 11:54, 21 Jun 2005 (PDT)''

Tantek at 00:07, 13 September 2007

2007-09-13T00:07:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 13 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= hReview FAQ =		= hReview FAQ =

	This page is for documenting Q&A about [[hreview\|hReview]]. If you have a new question to ask, Please consider first asking your question on the [http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss/ microformats-discuss] list.		This page is for documenting Q&A about [[hreview\|hReview]]. If you have a new question to ask, Please consider first asking your question on the [irc://irc.freenode.net/#microformats microformats irc channel] (preferably) or the [http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss/ microformats-discuss] list.

	== Q&A ==		== Q&A ==