hreview-issues - Revision history

Tantek: Reverted edits by ABIDEEN10 (Talk) to last version by Tantek

2013-04-07T04:58:01Z

Reverted edits by ABIDEEN10 (Talk) to last version by Tantek

Show changes

ABIDEEN10 at 02:48, 7 April 2013

2013-04-07T02:48:41Z

Show changes

Tantek: Protected "hreview-issues" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop]

2013-04-04T00:51:56Z

Protected "hreview-issues" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop]

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:51, 4 April 2013
(No difference)

Tantek: Reverted edits by ABIDEEN1 (Talk) to last version by MarcusJT

2013-04-04T00:47:59Z

Reverted edits by ABIDEEN1 (Talk) to last version by MarcusJT

Show changes

ABIDEEN1 at 00:15, 4 April 2013

2013-04-04T00:15:44Z

Show changes

MarcusJT: /* Item */

2010-11-02T15:47:34Z

Item

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 2 November 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:
	** No follow-up comments have been left yet.		** No follow-up comments have been left yet.
	</div>		</div>
	~~</div>~~

	<div class="hentry">		<div class="hentry">
	{{OpenIssue}}		*{{OpenIssue}}
	<span class="entry-summary author vcard">		<span class="entry-summary author vcard">
	<span class="published">2010-10-19</span>		<span class="published">2010-10-19</span>
Line 76:		Line 76:

	Anyway, I propose that just as the standard already requires that a number by itself (e.g. 3) should (in the absence of best/worst metadata) be interpreted as 3 out of 5, so a number followed (with or without space) by a percentage sign (e.g. 60%) should be acceptable, as it literally translates to 60 out of 100 (with a minimum of 0), and can be translated to the 1-5 rating format relatively easily, though dealing with percentages of less than 10% needs some thought given the default rating range of 1.0 to 5.0 that hReview currently defines.		Anyway, I propose that just as the standard already requires that a number by itself (e.g. 3) should (in the absence of best/worst metadata) be interpreted as 3 out of 5, so a number followed (with or without space) by a percentage sign (e.g. 60%) should be acceptable, as it literally translates to 60 out of 100 (with a minimum of 0), and can be translated to the 1-5 rating format relatively easily, though dealing with percentages of less than 10% needs some thought given the default rating range of 1.0 to 5.0 that hReview currently defines.

			''Addendum 2010-11-02: Google's Rich Snippets (which extracts information from hCard, hReview, hCalendar, and other microformats) will happily read a percentage value and display it as a rating out of 5. However, the validity of this approach remains unmentioned here and therefore a response/discussion/guidance/incorporation into the hReview standard is still required.''
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>


	<div class="hentry">		<div class="hentry">
	{{OpenIssue}}		*{{OpenIssue}}
	<span class="entry-summary author vcard">		<span class="entry-summary author vcard">
	<span class="published">2010-10-19</span>		<span class="published">2010-10-19</span>

Tantek: Reverted edits by Valera (Talk) to last version by MarcusJT

2010-10-29T18:50:06Z

Reverted edits by Valera (Talk) to last version by MarcusJT

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 29 October 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:
	OpenIssue 2005-01-04 by [[User:DavidJanes\|David Janes]]:		OpenIssue 2005-01-04 by [[User:DavidJanes\|David Janes]]:

	Atom defines rel="self" [http://atompub.org/2005/07/11/draft-ietf-atompub-format-10.html#rfc.section.4.2.7 here] ~~[http://www.essaywriters.net/ writers job]~~		Atom defines rel="self" [http://atompub.org/2005/07/11/draft-ietf-atompub-format-10.html#rfc.section.4.2.7 here]


	: The value "self" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href attribute identifies a resource equivalent to the containing element.		: The value "self" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href attribute identifies a resource equivalent to the containing element.

Valera: /* rel="self" */

2010-10-23T22:56:11Z

rel="self"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 23 October 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:
	OpenIssue 2005-01-04 by [[User:DavidJanes\|David Janes]]:		OpenIssue 2005-01-04 by [[User:DavidJanes\|David Janes]]:

	Atom defines rel="self" [http://atompub.org/2005/07/11/draft-ietf-atompub-format-10.html#rfc.section.4.2.7 here]		Atom defines rel="self" [http://atompub.org/2005/07/11/draft-ietf-atompub-format-10.html#rfc.section.4.2.7 here] [http://www.essaywriters.net/ writers job]


	: The value "self" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href attribute identifies a resource equivalent to the containing element.		: The value "self" signifies that the IRI in the value of the href attribute identifies a resource equivalent to the containing element.

MarcusJT: /* Issues */

2010-10-19T16:08:30Z

Issues

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 ** No follow-up comments have been left yet.
 </div>
 </div>

Codeguru413: /* Item */

2010-07-10T20:37:58Z

Item

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 10 July 2010
Line 49:		Line 49:
	<div class="hentry">		<div class="hentry">
	=== Item ===		=== Item ===
	*{{OpenIssue}} <span class="entry-summary author vcard"> <span class="published">2010-07-10</span> raised by <span class="fn">[[User:Codeguru413\|Codeguru413]]</span></span>.		*{{OpenIssue}} <span class="entry-summary author vcard"> <span class="published"><abbr title="2010-07-10">2010-07-10</abbr></span> raised by <span class="fn">[[User:Codeguru413\|Codeguru413]]</span></span>.
	<div class="entry-content discussion issues">		<div class="entry-content discussion issues">
	* <strong class="entry-title"><abbr title="International Standard Book Number">ISBN</abbr>s should not be used as unique IDs for [[hReview]]s</strong>.		* <strong class="entry-title"><abbr title="International Standard Book Number">ISBN</abbr>s should not be used as unique IDs for [[hReview]]s</strong>.