luna-brainstorming - Revision history

AndyMabbett: geo-extension-strawman

2006-12-11T19:17:53Z

geo-extension-strawman

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 11 December 2006
Line 53:		Line 53:
	*[[geo]]		*[[geo]]
	*[[mars]]		*[[mars]]
			*[[geo-extension-strawman]] - a possible implementation {{NewMarker}}

AndyMabbett: /* Drew McLellan */ attribution

2006-09-28T06:55:17Z

Drew McLellan: attribution

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 28 September 2006
Line 25:		Line 25:
	** Badly, I'd imagine. However, it's easier to modify user agents to account for developments than a bulk of existing published data - Drew.		** Badly, I'd imagine. However, it's easier to modify user agents to account for developments than a bulk of existing published data - Drew.
	*** What published data would need to be modified? (Either way, I like the idea of an hCard for 'Ed Straker, SHADO, Moonbase 1, the Moon'. Maybe we need to add a "solar system" attribute... ;-) ) - Andy Mabbett		*** What published data would need to be modified? (Either way, I like the idea of an hCard for 'Ed Straker, SHADO, Moonbase 1, the Moon'. Maybe we need to add a "solar system" attribute... ;-) ) - Andy Mabbett
	* Perhaps, like ~~Mabbett~~ points out, there should be a more general class for marking that this is a "coordinate", or a "location". Then a specific reference frame or spatial body can be defined. However, this may only happen once per document and then the rest of the locations references should/could be assumed to be in the same reference frame - AndrewTurner		* Perhaps, like Drew McLellan points out, there should be a more general class for marking that this is a "coordinate", or a "location". Then a specific reference frame or spatial body can be defined. However, this may only happen once per document and then the rest of the locations references should/could be assumed to be in the same reference frame - AndrewTurner

	== AndrewTurner ==		== AndrewTurner ==

AndrewTurner: Added thoughts behind a general "location" uf that can be used for various coordinate systems/spatial bodies.

2006-09-28T01:36:18Z

Added thoughts behind a general "location" uf that can be used for various coordinate systems/spatial bodies.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:36, 28 September 2006
Line 25:		Line 25:
	** Badly, I'd imagine. However, it's easier to modify user agents to account for developments than a bulk of existing published data - Drew.		** Badly, I'd imagine. However, it's easier to modify user agents to account for developments than a bulk of existing published data - Drew.
	*** What published data would need to be modified? (Either way, I like the idea of an hCard for 'Ed Straker, SHADO, Moonbase 1, the Moon'. Maybe we need to add a "solar system" attribute... ;-) ) - Andy Mabbett		*** What published data would need to be modified? (Either way, I like the idea of an hCard for 'Ed Straker, SHADO, Moonbase 1, the Moon'. Maybe we need to add a "solar system" attribute... ;-) ) - Andy Mabbett
			* Perhaps, like Mabbett points out, there should be a more general class for marking that this is a "coordinate", or a "location". Then a specific reference frame or spatial body can be defined. However, this may only happen once per document and then the rest of the locations references should/could be assumed to be in the same reference frame - AndrewTurner

	== AndrewTurner ==		== AndrewTurner ==

AndyMabbett: /* Proposal */ link

2006-09-23T12:52:58Z

Proposal: link

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 23 September 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Andy Mabbett==		==Andy Mabbett==
	===Proposal===		===Proposal===
	I propose a "luna" microformat, for marking up co-ordinates on our Moon. This would be based on the "[[geo]]" microformat (and thus relatively easy to implement, since code for "geo" can be re-used).		I propose a "'''[[luna]]'''" microformat, for marking up co-ordinates on our Moon. This would be based on the "[[geo]]" microformat (and thus relatively easy to implement, since code for "geo" can be re-used).

	Note, though, that [http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/stenneck.html] and [http://www.lunarrepublic.com/history/apollo_sites.shtml] indicate that more than one system of		Note, though, that [http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/stenneck.html] and [http://www.lunarrepublic.com/history/apollo_sites.shtml] indicate that more than one system of

AndyMabbett: /* AndrewTurner */ additional response

2006-09-23T12:52:26Z

AndrewTurner: additional response

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 23 September 2006
Line 46:		Line 46:
	</nowiki></pre>		</nowiki></pre>

	*The value must be "luna" not "moon". "Luna" is the scientifically-correct name for ''our'' moon; there are other moons in our solar ~~sywtem~~, such as Titan. - Andy Mabbett		*The value must be "luna" not "moon". "Luna" is the scientifically-correct name for ''our'' moon; there are other moons in our solar system, such as Titan. I have two concerns about re-using "geo" (aside from the fact that it means "Earth"!) - how it will affect existing tools, and the likely need to also specify the coordinate schema. Can these be addressed satisfactorily? - Andy Mabbett

	==See also==		==See also==

AndyMabbett: /* AndrewTurner */ "luna" not "moon"

2006-09-23T11:06:37Z

AndrewTurner: "luna" not "moon"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 23 September 2006
Line 45:		Line 45:
	</span>		</span>
	</nowiki></pre>		</nowiki></pre>

			*The value must be "luna" not "moon". "Luna" is the scientifically-correct name for ''our'' moon; there are other moons in our solar sywtem, such as Titan. - Andy Mabbett

	==See also==		==See also==

AndrewTurner: /* AndrewTurner */

2006-09-23T03:00:59Z

AndrewTurner

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 23 September 2006
Line 42:		Line 42:
	<span class="type" title="moon">The Apollo 11 mission landed at </span>		<span class="type" title="moon">The Apollo 11 mission landed at </span>
	<abbr class="latitude" title="0.67408">the Sea of Tranquility</abbr>		<abbr class="latitude" title="0.67408">the Sea of Tranquility</abbr>
	<abbr class="longitude" title="23.~~47297E~~></abbr >		<abbr class="longitude" title="23.47297"></abbr >
	</span>		</span>
	</nowiki></pre>		</nowiki></pre>

AndrewTurner at 03:00, 23 September 2006

2006-09-23T03:00:44Z

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 I believe the reference geoids for other planets are also under revision
 ==Drew McLellan==
@@ Line 24: / Line 25: @@
 ** Badly, I'd imagine. However, it's easier to modify user agents to account for developments than a bulk of existing published data - Drew.
 *** What published data would need to be modified? (Either way, I like the idea of an hCard for 'Ed Straker, SHADO, Moonbase 1, the Moon'. Maybe we need to add a "solar system" attribute... ;-) ) - Andy Mabbett
 ==See also==

AndyMabbett: /* Drew McLellan */

2006-09-22T13:30:22Z

Drew McLellan

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 22 September 2006
Line 23:		Line 23:
	* How would an existing user agent parse the grid ref.s for somewhere on the moon, marked up this way? - Andy Mabbett		* How would an existing user agent parse the grid ref.s for somewhere on the moon, marked up this way? - Andy Mabbett
	** Badly, I'd imagine. However, it's easier to modify user agents to account for developments than a bulk of existing published data - Drew.		** Badly, I'd imagine. However, it's easier to modify user agents to account for developments than a bulk of existing published data - Drew.
	*** What published data would need to be modified? (Either way, I like the idea of an hCard for 'Ed Straker, Moonbase 1, the Moon'. Maybe we need to add a "solar system" ~~atribute~~... ;-) ) - Andy Mabbett		*** What published data would need to be modified? (Either way, I like the idea of an hCard for 'Ed Straker, SHADO, Moonbase 1, the Moon'. Maybe we need to add a "solar system" attribute... ;-) ) - Andy Mabbett

	==See also==		==See also==

AndyMabbett: /* Drew McLellan */ response (& Ed)

2006-09-22T13:29:29Z

Drew McLellan: response (& Ed)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 22 September 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Obviously the name 'geo' applies to Earth, but we should seriously consider if we want to create a different microformat for every lump of rock someone wishes to map. It has to be advantageous to have a single format for this function that can be applied to any orbiting mass.		Obviously the name 'geo' applies to Earth, but we should seriously consider if we want to create a different microformat for every lump of rock someone wishes to map. It has to be advantageous to have a single format for this function that can be applied to any orbiting mass.

	*How would an existing user agent parse the grid ref.s for somewhere on the moon, marked up this way? - Andy Mabbett		* How would an existing user agent parse the grid ref.s for somewhere on the moon, marked up this way? - Andy Mabbett
	** Badly, I'd imagine. However, it's easier to modify user agents to account for developments than a bulk of existing published data - Drew.		** Badly, I'd imagine. However, it's easier to modify user agents to account for developments than a bulk of existing published data - Drew.
			*** What published data would need to be modified? (Either way, I like the idea of an hCard for 'Ed Straker, Moonbase 1, the Moon'. Maybe we need to add a "solar system" atribute... ;-) ) - Andy Mabbett

	==See also==		==See also==