meeting-minutes-formats - Revision history

Tempatrakitkursusservicekomputer at 13:25, 19 February 2017

2017-02-19T13:25:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:25, 19 February 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	* W3C has thought a bit about this, but doesn't appear to have completed any implementation		* W3C has thought a bit about this, but doesn't appear to have completed any implementation
	** [http://~~www~~.w3.~~org/2002/11/DAML-IOW#Specific~~ Suggestions for using RDF/OWL] for marking up meeting records.		** [http://cellularlampung.blogspot.co.id Suggestions for using RDF/OWL] for marking up meeting records.
	** What seem to be DanC's [http://~~www~~.w3.~~org/2000/11/mr76/~~ work on RDF schema for minutes], for use with W3C tools.		** What seem to be DanC's [http://lowongankerjalampung161289.blogspot.co.id work on RDF schema for minutes], for use with W3C tools.
	** A [http://~~esw~~.w3.~~org~~/~~topic~~/~~MeetingRecords~~ wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] includes some "noodling" on meeting record ontology, as well as other resources at the end.		** A [http://www.jasacleaningservice.id/2017/02/tempat-kursus-service-rakit-komputer-di.html wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] includes some "noodling" on meeting record ontology, as well as other resources at the end.
	** These resources are based on the schema implicit in W3C's agenda, action item, and participation tracking agents, RSSAgent and Zakim, as noted in [[meeting-minutes-examples]].		** These resources are based on the schema implicit in W3C's agenda, action item, and participation tracking agents, RSSAgent and Zakim, as noted in [[meeting-minutes-examples]].
	* W3C's approach is focused on how to create usable data for computer assistance in meeting organization and recording.		* W3C's approach is focused on how to create usable data for computer assistance in meeting organization and recording.
	** This means that it includes kinds of data that would otherwise be in the "20%" category according to our analysis, such as specific kinds of decision details, agenda preparation, further details on participation, etc. (See [http://~~esw~~.w3.~~org/topic~~/~~MeetingRecords~~ wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] again, in particular.)		** This means that it includes kinds of data that would otherwise be in the "20%" category according to our analysis, such as specific kinds of decision details, agenda preparation, further details on participation, etc. (See [http://tempatrakitkursusservicekomputer.blogspot.co.id/ wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] again, in particular.)
	** Agenda preparation, meeting calling, etc. is more of a focus for W3C; a more comprehensive, extended role for meeting recording. Is this something we want to prepare for?		** Agenda preparation, meeting calling, etc. is more of a focus for W3C; a more comprehensive, extended role for meeting recording. Is this something we want to prepare for?

Brush: /* Meeting Minutes: Existing Formats */ - See also

2006-05-08T17:38:56Z

Meeting Minutes: Existing Formats: - See also

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 8 May 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	None of these seem to be a complete schema. What am I missing?		None of these seem to be a complete schema. What am I missing?

			== See Also ==
			* [[meeting-minutes-examples]]
			* [[meeting-minutes-brainstorming]]

Brush: /* Meeting Minutes: Existing Formats */ - add some analysis of W3C's approach

2006-05-08T17:35:48Z

Meeting Minutes: Existing Formats: - add some analysis of W3C's approach

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 8 May 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	** What seem to be DanC's [http://www.w3.org/2000/11/mr76/ work on RDF schema for minutes], for use with W3C tools.		** What seem to be DanC's [http://www.w3.org/2000/11/mr76/ work on RDF schema for minutes], for use with W3C tools.
	** A [http://esw.w3.org/topic/MeetingRecords wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] includes some "noodling" on meeting record ontology, as well as other resources at the end.		** A [http://esw.w3.org/topic/MeetingRecords wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] includes some "noodling" on meeting record ontology, as well as other resources at the end.
	** These resources are based on the schema implicit in W3C's agenda, action item, and participation tracking agents, RSSAgent and Zakim, as noted in [http://~~microformats~~.org/wiki/meeting~~-minutes-examples~~ meeting~~-minutes-examples]~~.		** These resources are based on the schema implicit in W3C's agenda, action item, and participation tracking agents, RSSAgent and Zakim, as noted in [[meeting-minutes-examples]].
			* W3C's approach is focused on how to create usable data for computer assistance in meeting organization and recording.
			** This means that it includes kinds of data that would otherwise be in the "20%" category according to our analysis, such as specific kinds of decision details, agenda preparation, further details on participation, etc. (See [http://esw.w3.org/topic/MeetingRecords wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] again, in particular.)
			** Agenda preparation, meeting calling, etc. is more of a focus for W3C; a more comprehensive, extended role for meeting recording. Is this something we want to prepare for?

	~~But none~~ of these seem to be a complete schema. What am I missing?		None of these seem to be a complete schema. What am I missing?

Brush at 21:44, 6 May 2006

2006-05-06T21:44:15Z

New page

=Meeting Minutes: Existing Formats=

''I don't know of any fully described existing schema for meeting minutes; please help with this section!'' - Brush

* W3C has thought a bit about this, but doesn't appear to have completed any implementation
** [http://www.w3.org/2002/11/DAML-IOW#Specific Suggestions for using RDF/OWL] for marking up meeting records.
** What seem to be DanC's [http://www.w3.org/2000/11/mr76/ work on RDF schema for minutes], for use with W3C tools.
** A [http://esw.w3.org/topic/MeetingRecords wiki discussion page about Meeting Records] includes some "noodling" on meeting record ontology, as well as other resources at the end.
** These resources are based on the schema implicit in W3C's agenda, action item, and participation tracking agents, RSSAgent and Zakim, as noted in [http://microformats.org/wiki/meeting-minutes-examples meeting-minutes-examples].

But none of these seem to be a complete schema. What am I missing?