review-brainstorming - Revision history

Tantek: revert some old vandalism

2012-04-25T09:38:09Z

revert some old vandalism

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 25 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~c4ttabochi~~
	~~coolotaric~~
	= Review Brainstorming =		= Review Brainstorming =

Line 13:		Line 11:
	Copied from [[reviews-formats]] which itself was contributed from [http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/ReviewsFormats Technorati Developer's Wiki: ReviewsFormats])		Copied from [[reviews-formats]] which itself was contributed from [http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/ReviewsFormats Technorati Developer's Wiki: ReviewsFormats])

	* Tantek ~~ÃÂelik~~		* Tantek Çelik
	* Niall Kennedy		* Niall Kennedy

BaszeLolor: nocnaou

2008-12-16T18:35:41Z

nocnaou

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:35, 16 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			c4ttabochi
	coolotaric		coolotaric
	= Review Brainstorming =		= Review Brainstorming =
Line 12:		Line 13:
	Copied from [[reviews-formats]] which itself was contributed from [http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/ReviewsFormats Technorati Developer's Wiki: ReviewsFormats])		Copied from [[reviews-formats]] which itself was contributed from [http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/ReviewsFormats Technorati Developer's Wiki: ReviewsFormats])

	* Tantek ~~Ãelik~~		* Tantek ÃÂelik
	* Niall Kennedy		* Niall Kennedy

ErchiDelta: trocvar

2008-12-16T16:32:04Z

trocvar

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 16 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			coolotaric
	= Review Brainstorming =		= Review Brainstorming =

Line 11:		Line 12:
	Copied from [[reviews-formats]] which itself was contributed from [http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/ReviewsFormats Technorati Developer's Wiki: ReviewsFormats])		Copied from [[reviews-formats]] which itself was contributed from [http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/ReviewsFormats Technorati Developer's Wiki: ReviewsFormats])

	* Tantek ~~Çelik~~		* Tantek Ãelik
	* Niall Kennedy		* Niall Kennedy

Tantek: moved hReview iteration and brainstorming to its own page

2006-07-27T02:19:28Z

moved hReview iteration and brainstorming to its own page

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:19, 27 July 2006
Line 37:		Line 37:
	See [[hreview\|hReview]] for the result and evolution of these thoughts on a microformat.		See [[hreview\|hReview]] for the result and evolution of these thoughts on a microformat.

	~~== hReview 0.3 thoughts ==~~		See [[hreview-brainstorming\|hReview brainstorming]] for iteration and brainstorming on hReview itself.

	~~This iteration of hReview is directly in response to~~ [[hreview-~~feedback]] and [[hreview-issues]]. See those documents for more details.~~

	~~Changes from~~ hReview ~~0.2:~~

	* MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard\|hCard]] for ~~the item description of a business~~
	* reviewer changes
	** make reviewer optional per feedback from Ryan King and ~~Mark Nottingham~~
	** If reviewer is absent from the hReview, then look outside the hReview, in the context of the page, for the reviewer. If there is no "reviewer" outside either, then use the <code><nowiki><address></nowiki></code> for the page.
	** MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard\|hCard]] to represent reviewer information
	* SHOULD use [[hcalendar\|hCalendar]] to represent an item of 'type' 'event'
	** Accepted. We considered making this a MUST, and postponed it to the next version, based on ~~publication experience with 0.3~~
	* add one decimal digit of precision to ratings' numerical values.
	* use [http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Value_excerpting the "value" construct from hCard] (as it is used in "tel" properties for example) to more explicitly markup the rating value when also providing (marking up) the best/worst of a rating. need to also provide an example that does so.
	* add [[rel-license]] to indicate the license of the hReview ~~as a whole.~~
	** add this to [[hatom]] as well!
	* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.
	* add [[include-pattern]] support to allow multiple reviews for the same item to not repeat the item info.
	~~Informative improvements:~~
	* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag. E.g. ~~what does Food:18/30 mean?~~

Tantek: /* hReview 0.3 thoughts */

2006-02-22T22:53:26Z

hReview 0.3 thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 22 February 2006
Line 55:		Line 55:
	** add this to [[hatom]] as well!		** add this to [[hatom]] as well!
	* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.		* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.
			* add [[include-pattern]] support to allow multiple reviews for the same item to not repeat the item info.
	Informative improvements:		Informative improvements:
	* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag. E.g. what does Food:18/30 mean?		* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag. E.g. what does Food:18/30 mean?

Tantek: issue resolutions accepted.

2006-02-21T23:24:32Z

issue resolutions accepted.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 21 February 2006
Line 53:		Line 53:
	* use [http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Value_excerpting the "value" construct from hCard] (as it is used in "tel" properties for example) to more explicitly markup the rating value when also providing (marking up) the best/worst of a rating. need to also provide an example that does so.		* use [http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Value_excerpting the "value" construct from hCard] (as it is used in "tel" properties for example) to more explicitly markup the rating value when also providing (marking up) the best/worst of a rating. need to also provide an example that does so.
	* add [[rel-license]] to indicate the license of the hReview as a whole.		* add [[rel-license]] to indicate the license of the hReview as a whole.
			** add this to [[hatom]] as well!
	* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.		* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.

	Informative improvements:		Informative improvements:
	* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag. E.g. what does Food:18/30 mean?		* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag. E.g. what does Food:18/30 mean?

Tantek at 23:15, 21 February 2006

2006-02-21T23:15:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 21 February 2006
Line 49:		Line 49:
	** MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard\|hCard]] to represent reviewer information		** MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard\|hCard]] to represent reviewer information
	* SHOULD use [[hcalendar\|hCalendar]] to represent an item of 'type' 'event'		* SHOULD use [[hcalendar\|hCalendar]] to represent an item of 'type' 'event'
			** Accepted. We considered making this a MUST, and postponed it to the next version, based on publication experience with 0.3
	* add one decimal digit of precision to ratings' numerical values.		* add one decimal digit of precision to ratings' numerical values.
	* use [http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Value_excerpting the "value" construct from hCard] (as it is used in "tel" properties for example) to more explicitly markup the rating value when also providing (marking up) the best/worst of a rating. need to also provide an example that does so.		* use [http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Value_excerpting the "value" construct from hCard] (as it is used in "tel" properties for example) to more explicitly markup the rating value when also providing (marking up) the best/worst of a rating. need to also provide an example that does so.

Tantek at 23:00, 21 February 2006

2006-02-21T23:00:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 21 February 2006
Line 44:		Line 44:

	* MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard\|hCard]] for the item description of a business		* MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard\|hCard]] for the item description of a business
	* MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard\|hCard]] to represent reviewer information		* reviewer changes
	* make reviewer optional per feedback from Ryan King and Mark Nottingham		** make reviewer optional per feedback from Ryan King and Mark Nottingham
			** If reviewer is absent from the hReview, then look outside the hReview, in the context of the page, for the reviewer. If there is no "reviewer" outside either, then use the <code><nowiki><address></nowiki></code> for the page.
			** MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard\|hCard]] to represent reviewer information
	* SHOULD use [[hcalendar\|hCalendar]] to represent an item of 'type' 'event'		* SHOULD use [[hcalendar\|hCalendar]] to represent an item of 'type' 'event'
	* add one decimal digit of precision to ratings' numerical values.		* add one decimal digit of precision to ratings' numerical values.

Tantek: /* hReview 0.3 thoughts */

2006-01-27T08:46:58Z

hReview 0.3 thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:46, 27 January 2006
Line 52:		Line 52:
	* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.		* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.

	Informative improvements		Informative improvements:
	* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag. E.g. what does Food:18/30 mean?		* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag. E.g. what does Food:18/30 mean?

Tantek: added informative improvements

2006-01-27T08:46:07Z

added informative improvements

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:46, 27 January 2006
Line 51:		Line 51:
	* add [[rel-license]] to indicate the license of the hReview as a whole.		* add [[rel-license]] to indicate the license of the hReview as a whole.
	* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.		* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.

			Informative improvements
			* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag. E.g. what does Food:18/30 mean?