workofart-brainstorming - Revision history

Tantek: Reverted edits by Drive (Talk) to last version by Ebukva

2010-09-22T09:09:40Z

Reverted edits by Drive (Talk) to last version by Ebukva

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:09, 22 September 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* [[User:TimG\| Tim Gambell]]		* [[User:TimG\| Tim Gambell]]
	* Samantha Orme		* Samantha Orme
	* [http://www.asiawriters.com/ freelance writing job]
	* [[User:Ebukva\|Emir Bukva]]		* [[User:Ebukva\|Emir Bukva]]

Drive: /* Participants */

2010-09-21T18:13:47Z

Participants

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 21 September 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* [[User:TimG\| Tim Gambell]]		* [[User:TimG\| Tim Gambell]]
	* Samantha Orme		* Samantha Orme
			* [http://www.asiawriters.com/ freelance writing job]
	* [[User:Ebukva\|Emir Bukva]]		* [[User:Ebukva\|Emir Bukva]]

Ebukva: /* Participants */ Added myself to the list of participants

2010-08-13T18:26:49Z

Participants: Added myself to the list of participants

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 13 August 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* [[User:TimG\| Tim Gambell]]		* [[User:TimG\| Tim Gambell]]
	* Samantha Orme		* Samantha Orme
			* [[User:Ebukva\|Emir Bukva]]

	== The Problem ==		== The Problem ==

Lazcorp: /* CDWA Lite Strawman */

2009-12-06T10:58:36Z

CDWA Lite Strawman

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:58, 6 December 2009
Line 172:		Line 172:
	* Is the markup prohibitively complicated?		* Is the markup prohibitively complicated?
	* Are wrap tags (such as "objectWorkTypeWrap", "titleWrap" etc) necessary?		* Are wrap tags (such as "objectWorkTypeWrap", "titleWrap" etc) necessary?
	* Are display tags (such as "displayCreator") preferable to indexing tags? (See the [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite~~/index~~.html CDWA Lite XML Schema] for a list of display and indexing tags.)		* Are display tags (such as "displayCreator") preferable to indexing tags? (See the [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite.html CDWA Lite XML Schema] for a list of display and indexing tags.)
	* What is the best way to deal with attributes on xml tags (such as "type=", "termsource=" and "termsourceID=")?		* What is the best way to deal with attributes on xml tags (such as "type=", "termsource=" and "termsourceID=")?

Lazcorp: /* CDWA Lite Strawman */

2009-12-06T10:56:37Z

CDWA Lite Strawman

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 6 December 2009
Line 132:		Line 132:
	=== [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite/index.html CDWA Lite] Strawman ===		=== [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite/index.html CDWA Lite] Strawman ===

	[http://microformats.org/wiki/class-design-pattern Use class names] based on the [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite.html CDWA Lite 0.~~9 Work in Progress~~ XML Schema].		[http://microformats.org/wiki/class-design-pattern Use class names] based on the [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite.html CDWA Lite 1.1 XML Schema].

	This example is based on [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/3_cataloging_examples/examples/04_watercolor_turner.html a CDWA example]		This example is based on [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/3_cataloging_examples/examples/04_watercolor_turner.html a CDWA example]

Lazcorp: /* CDWA Lite Strawman */

2009-12-06T10:51:57Z

CDWA Lite Strawman

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 6 December 2009
Line 132:		Line 132:
	=== [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite/index.html CDWA Lite] Strawman ===		=== [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite/index.html CDWA Lite] Strawman ===

	[http://microformats.org/wiki/class-design-pattern Use class names] based on the [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite~~/index~~.html CDWA Lite 0.9 Work in Progress XML Schema].		[http://microformats.org/wiki/class-design-pattern Use class names] based on the [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/cdwalite.html CDWA Lite 0.9 Work in Progress XML Schema].

	This example is based on [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/3_cataloging_examples/examples/04_watercolor_turner.html a CDWA example]		This example is based on [http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/3_cataloging_examples/examples/04_watercolor_turner.html a CDWA example]

Brian: Reverted edits by ElttrAczel (Talk) to last version by FrankieRoberto

2008-12-20T22:13:06Z

Reverted edits by ElttrAczel (Talk) to last version by FrankieRoberto

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 20 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~nocnaolo~~
	= Work of Art Brainstorming =		= Work of Art Brainstorming =

ElttrAczel: rolialvib

2008-12-20T03:47:50Z

rolialvib

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:47, 20 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			nocnaolo
	= Work of Art Brainstorming =		= Work of Art Brainstorming =

FrankieRoberto: /* citation + [http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ Dublin Core] Strawman */

2008-05-29T11:17:55Z

citation + [http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ Dublin Core] Strawman

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:17, 29 May 2008
Line 91:		Line 91:
	\| title \|\| \|\| [Title or Names]		\| title \|\| \|\| [Title or Names]
	\|-		\|-
	\| creator \|\| (hCard) \|\| [Creation-Creator]		\| creator \|\| [[hCard\|(hCard)]] \|\| [Creation-Creator]
	\|-		\|-
	\| creator-dates \|\| (dates) \|\| [vitalDatesCreator]		\| creator-dates \|\| (dates) \|\| [vitalDatesCreator]
Line 99:		Line 99:
	\| creator-role \|\| \|\| [roleCreator]		\| creator-role \|\| \|\| [roleCreator]
	\|-		\|-
	\| subject \|\| (~~keywords~~) \|\| [Subject Matter]		\| subject \|\| keywords (using [[rel-tag]]?) \|\| [Subject Matter]
	\|-		\|-
	\| description \|\| \|\| [Descriptive Note]		\| description \|\| \|\| [Descriptive Note]
Line 117:		Line 117:
	\| source \|\| (current repository) \|\| [Current Location-Repository Name]		\| source \|\| (current repository) \|\| [Current Location-Repository Name]
	\|-		\|-
	\| source-location \|\| (current repository location -- geo?) \|\| [Current Location-Repository Location]		\| source-location \|\| (current repository location -- [[adr]] or [[geo]]?) \|\| [Current Location-Repository Location]
	\|-		\|-
	\| language \|\| \|\|		\| language \|\| \|\|
	\|-		\|-
	\| rights \|\| (copyright information) \|\| [Copyright/Restrictions]		\| rights \|\| (copyright information) / [[rel-license]]? \|\| [Copyright/Restrictions]
	\|-		\|-
	\| provenance \|\| \|\| [Ownership/Collecting History-Description]		\| provenance \|\| \|\| [Ownership/Collecting History-Description]

FrankieRoberto: /* What about citation? */

2008-05-29T11:07:54Z

What about citation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 29 May 2008
Line 68:		Line 68:
	** Are museums more likely to adopt a standard that is easy to understand and read or one based on an existing standard designed for museums? -- [[User:TimG\|Tim]]		** Are museums more likely to adopt a standard that is easy to understand and read or one based on an existing standard designed for museums? -- [[User:TimG\|Tim]]
	*** I think it all depends on the complexity and ease of use. Microformats out-do existing legacy formats (even when based on those legacy formats!) purely because they are simpler to author, and provide a much lower barrier to entry and understanding. - Tantek		*** I think it all depends on the complexity and ease of use. Microformats out-do existing legacy formats (even when based on those legacy formats!) purely because they are simpler to author, and provide a much lower barrier to entry and understanding. - Tantek
			*** Simpler to author and understand is always better. The shorter the spec, the more likely it is to be implemented! [[User:FrankieRoberto\|FrankieRoberto]] (Science Museum, which holds more works of art than you'd think)
	** I'm not exactly sure what you mean by extensions. If you mean informal extensions, I think we're better off not sanctioning them. The only fields that are going to be really useful (from a readers/parsers point of view) are the ones that are consistenly applied (the core components you propose). However, if you mean extensions like this microformat is an extension of the [[citation]] microformat (that is, developed using the microformats process), I agree completely. Your thoughts? -- [[User:TimG\|Tim]]		** I'm not exactly sure what you mean by extensions. If you mean informal extensions, I think we're better off not sanctioning them. The only fields that are going to be really useful (from a readers/parsers point of view) are the ones that are consistenly applied (the core components you propose). However, if you mean extensions like this microformat is an extension of the [[citation]] microformat (that is, developed using the microformats process), I agree completely. Your thoughts? -- [[User:TimG\|Tim]]