xmdp-examples-fr - Revision history

ChristopheDucamp: [fr: translated]

2007-09-27T22:53:11Z

[fr: translated]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 27 September 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	* [http://iamalpha.com/.developer/profile/ AOL ModuleT: A Module Transport Microformat Profile]		* [http://iamalpha.com/.developer/profile/ AOL ModuleT: A Module Transport Microformat Profile]
	* [http://nanobox.chipx86.com/profile/1.3/ David Hammond~~'s General Meta Data Profile~~, 1.3]		* [http://nanobox.chipx86.com/profile/1.3/ Le Profil Général Meta Data de David Hammond, 1.3]
	* [http://loadaveragezero.com/xml/xmdp.php Douglas Clifton~~'s XMDP file~~] (Note: [http://loadaveragezero.com/app/dbrowse/laz/tables/xmdp/data Douglas Clifton stores his XMDP relationsips in a database]).		* [http://loadaveragezero.com/xml/xmdp.php Fichier XMDP de Douglas Clifton] (Note : [http://loadaveragezero.com/app/dbrowse/laz/tables/xmdp/data Douglas Clifton stores his XMDP relationsips in a database]).
	** ~~This~~ XMDP ~~is not valid~~, ~~or rather only defines new~~ <code>meta</code> ~~names~~ (~~which doesn~~'~~t seem to be the intent~~), ~~with definition~~ prose ~~like~~ "Defines the relationship" ~~which seems to imply a~~ <code>rel</code> ~~value rather than a~~ meta ~~name~~. ~~In additional~~, ~~values like~~ "license" ~~and~~ "tag", ~~in addition to also being~~ 'rel~~' values~~, ~~should simply normatively reference~~ [[rel-license-fr\|rel-license]] ~~and~~ [[rel-tag-fr\|rel-tag]] ~~respectively rather than redefining them~~, ~~and~~ "copyright" ~~and~~ "help" ~~do not require definition at all because they are among the~~ [http://www.w3.~~org~~/TR/~~REC-html40~~/types.html#~~type~~-~~links predefined link~~ types in HTML4].		** Ce XMDP n'est pas valide, ou plutôt ne fait que définir de nouveaux <code>meta</code> noms (ce qui ne semble pas être l'objectif), avec une prose de définition comme "Defines the relationship" qui semble implicitement vouloir dire une valeur <code>rel</code> plutôt qu'un nom meta. En outre, les valeurs comme "license" et "tag", en plus d'être aussi des valeurs "rel", devraient simplement faire référence normativement à respectivement [[rel-license-fr\|rel-license]] et [[rel-tag-fr\|rel-tag]] plutôt que de les redéfinir, et "copyright" et "help" n'exigent pas du tout de définition parce qu'ils partie des [http://www.la-grange.net/w3c/html4.01/types.html#h-6.12 types de liens prédéfinis dans le HTML4].

ChristopheDucamp: [links dropped with -fr extension]

2007-09-27T22:30:26Z

[links dropped with -fr extension]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 27 September 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* [http://nanobox.chipx86.com/profile/1.3/ David Hammond's General Meta Data Profile, 1.3]		* [http://nanobox.chipx86.com/profile/1.3/ David Hammond's General Meta Data Profile, 1.3]
	* [http://loadaveragezero.com/xml/xmdp.php Douglas Clifton's XMDP file] (Note: [http://loadaveragezero.com/app/dbrowse/laz/tables/xmdp/data Douglas Clifton stores his XMDP relationsips in a database]).		* [http://loadaveragezero.com/xml/xmdp.php Douglas Clifton's XMDP file] (Note: [http://loadaveragezero.com/app/dbrowse/laz/tables/xmdp/data Douglas Clifton stores his XMDP relationsips in a database]).
	** This XMDP is not valid, or rather only defines new <code>meta</code> names (which doesn't seem to be the intent), with definition prose like "Defines the relationship" which seems to imply a <code>rel</code> value rather than a meta name. In additional, values like "license" and "tag", in addition to also being 'rel' values, should simply normatively reference [[rel-license]] and [[rel-tag]] respectively rather than redefining them, and "copyright" and "help" do not require definition at all because they are among the [http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#type-links predefined link types in HTML4].		** This XMDP is not valid, or rather only defines new <code>meta</code> names (which doesn't seem to be the intent), with definition prose like "Defines the relationship" which seems to imply a <code>rel</code> value rather than a meta name. In additional, values like "license" and "tag", in addition to also being 'rel' values, should simply normatively reference [[rel-license-fr\|rel-license]] and [[rel-tag-fr\|rel-tag]] respectively rather than redefining them, and "copyright" and "help" do not require definition at all because they are among the [http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#type-links predefined link types in HTML4].

ChristopheDucamp: [to be translated]

2007-09-27T22:29:50Z

[to be translated]

New page

= XMDP Exemples =

Il existe bien sûr de nombreux exemples de profils [[xmdp-fr|XMDP]] dans les [[microformats-fr|microformats]] (par ex. le profil XFN : http://gmpg.org/xfn/11), mais quelques types ont commencé à utiliser XMDP pour documenter la sémantique de leurs propres sites.

== XMDP Exemples dans la Jungle ==

* [http://iamalpha.com/.developer/profile/ AOL ModuleT: A Module Transport Microformat Profile]
* [http://nanobox.chipx86.com/profile/1.3/ David Hammond's General Meta Data Profile, 1.3]
* [http://loadaveragezero.com/xml/xmdp.php Douglas Clifton's XMDP file] (Note: [http://loadaveragezero.com/app/dbrowse/laz/tables/xmdp/data Douglas Clifton stores his XMDP relationsips in a database]).
** This XMDP is not valid, or rather only defines new <code>meta</code> names (which doesn't seem to be the intent), with definition prose like "Defines the relationship" which seems to imply a <code>rel</code> value rather than a meta name. In additional, values like "license" and "tag", in addition to also being 'rel' values, should simply normatively reference [[rel-license]] and [[rel-tag]] respectively rather than redefining them, and "copyright" and "help" do not require definition at all because they are among the [http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#type-links predefined link types in HTML4].