rel-syndication: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(stub) |
(use latest template to link to u-syndication) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{latest|u-syndication}} | |||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
A permalink for a blog post should | == Publishers == | ||
A permalink for a blog post should hyperlink with <code>rel="syndication"</code> to copies that the author has syndicated onto other sites. | |||
This is a page to page relationship, and thus blog posts in aggregate form, e.g. archive pages, home/updates pages, should NOT use rel="syndication". | This is a page to page relationship, and thus blog posts in aggregate form, e.g. archive pages, home/updates pages, should NOT use rel="syndication". | ||
== Consumers == | |||
Consuming applications can use rel=syndication in a number of ways: | |||
* site specific post and other [http://indiewebcamp.com/webactions webaction] buttons can discover the syndicated copy for their site. | |||
* connecting POSSE'd comment posts to each other and to the POSSE'd copies of original posts. See http://indiewebcamp.com/comment#POSSE_a_comment for more. | |||
== Alternatives == | |||
=== u-syndication === | |||
In addition rel=syndication on links from a blog post to syndicated copies of it, those links can also have the markup: | |||
* <code>class="u-syndication"</code> which will likely get picked up as part of their containing [[h-entry]] object. | |||
Advantages: | |||
* Blog posts can use on links to syndicated copies, in any context, e.g. blog posts in aggregate form like archive pages or home/updates pages, may use class="u-syndication". | |||
== Examples in the wild == | == Examples in the wild == | ||
| Line 15: | Line 33: | ||
On some blog posts: | On some blog posts: | ||
* tantek.com | * tantek.com | ||
* adactio.com | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[rel-in-reply-to]] | * [[rel-in-reply-to]] | ||
* http://indiewebcamp.com/posts-elsewhere | * http://indiewebcamp.com/posts-elsewhere | ||
* http://indiewebcamp.com/rel-syndication | |||
* http://indiewebcamp.com/syndication | |||
* http://indiewebcamp.com/comments | * http://indiewebcamp.com/comments | ||
Latest revision as of 00:51, 19 February 2021
See latest version: u-syndication
This article is a stub. You can help the microformats.org wiki by expanding it.
Publishers
A permalink for a blog post should hyperlink with rel="syndication" to copies that the author has syndicated onto other sites.
This is a page to page relationship, and thus blog posts in aggregate form, e.g. archive pages, home/updates pages, should NOT use rel="syndication".
Consumers
Consuming applications can use rel=syndication in a number of ways:
- site specific post and other webaction buttons can discover the syndicated copy for their site.
- connecting POSSE'd comment posts to each other and to the POSSE'd copies of original posts. See http://indiewebcamp.com/comment#POSSE_a_comment for more.
Alternatives
u-syndication
In addition rel=syndication on links from a blog post to syndicated copies of it, those links can also have the markup:
class="u-syndication"which will likely get picked up as part of their containing h-entry object.
Advantages:
- Blog posts can use on links to syndicated copies, in any context, e.g. blog posts in aggregate form like archive pages or home/updates pages, may use class="u-syndication".
Examples in the wild
Sites that are using rel="syndication"
On all their blog posts/notes automatically:
- aaronparecki.com
- tommorris.org
- waterpigs.co.uk
On some blog posts:
- tantek.com
- adactio.com