reinvented-wheels: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Undo revision 64165 by Michaelrandolph (Talk) => removed spammy links) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=== item === | === item === | ||
The so-called "item" microformat | The so-called [http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2005-October/001364.html "item" microformat] is a reinvention of <code><li></code>. | ||
== before 2005 == | == before 2005 == | ||
=== OPML === | === OPML === | ||
OPML is a reinvention of <code><ul></code>, <code><ol></code>, <code><li></code>, as demonstrated by [[xoxo]]. | [http://www.opml.org/spec OPML] is a reinvention of <code><ul></code>, <code><ol></code>, <code><li></code>, as demonstrated by [[xoxo]]. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:54, 28 January 2014
reinvented wheels
This page is here to document proposals that have been made one time or another that were simply reinventing functionality already present in semantic (X)HTML, in the hopes that by documenting attempts to reinvent the wheel, we can avoid or minimize re-re-inventions, and encourage re-use instead.
At some point perhaps we can order these more specifically by date. For now, I'm putting everything under 2005. - Tantek
2005
rel mobile
rel="mobile" is a reinvention of:
<link rel="alternate" media="handheld" ... />
But Atom doesn't have the 'media' attribute.
- Then the solution is to add the 'media' attribute, rather than reinventing another way of doing media, OR to simply use a XHTML namespace qualifed <link> tag which can then have the media attribute. In either case, adding a new rel value is both unnecessary and undesirable.
item
The so-called "item" microformat is a reinvention of <li>.
before 2005
OPML
OPML is a reinvention of <ul>, <ol>, <li>, as demonstrated by xoxo.