User:LynX: Difference between revisions
(meditation) |
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) (invalid link (please remove my comment, when link is fixed)) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Then again, if I look at how we implemented our [http://about.psyc.eu/Profile|profile surfing] feature, would it make sense to have a microformat in the profile instead of having the profile page generated out of the profile data? Could be. I'll meditate about it. | Then again, if I look at how we implemented our [http://about.psyc.eu/Profile|profile surfing] feature, would it make sense to have a microformat in the profile instead of having the profile page generated out of the profile data? Could be. I'll meditate about it. | ||
* "The requested page title was invalid, empty, or an incorrectly linked inter-language or inter-wiki title." [[User:AndyMabbett|Andy Mabbett]] 00:59, 7 Sep 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:59, 7 September 2007
I'm into decentralized social networks so I'm also interested in social-network-portability, although I'd first want to see the first thing happen - then the rest can be ported, if it cares to.
I'm a bit surprised we ended up on microformats to this purpose, as publishing things on the web is fundamentally anti-privacy, and that's an essential goal for social networking.
So I'm asking.. can we be private on the web? And if we need to create such a private web first, why bother? Why not use an optimized protocol to achieve our goals instead of extracting them from documents that hardly anyone will read?
Then again, if I look at how we implemented our surfing feature, would it make sense to have a microformat in the profile instead of having the profile page generated out of the profile data? Could be. I'll meditate about it.
- "The requested page title was invalid, empty, or an incorrectly linked inter-language or inter-wiki title." Andy Mabbett 00:59, 7 Sep 2007 (PDT)