rel-tag-feedback: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* [http://napsterization.org/stories/archives/000569.html Mary Hodder's published usability study with bloggers regarding tags] Her conclusion: Bloggers asked for better tagging options and more licensing options. | * [http://napsterization.org/stories/archives/000569.html Mary Hodder's published usability study with bloggers regarding tags] Her conclusion: Bloggers asked for better tagging options and more licensing options. | ||
* The heavy reliance on IMO poorly-conceived URL structures as "de facto best practice" means that some people who wish to provide a "tag here!" indicator in their markup can't play in your sandbox. A better solution would either take the content of the '''a''' tag as the tag, or would permit some sort of pattern-matching specification to point consumers of your tag to the "tag" portion of the URL. See [[rel-tag-issues]]. [[User:JonathanFeinberg|JonathanFeinberg]] 11:37, 9 Feb 2006 (PST) |
Revision as of 19:37, 9 February 2006
rel-tag feedback
This document is for keeping track of feedback about rel-tag, one of several microformats.
Feedback
General Questions
See the rel-tag FAQ and rel FAQ.
Issues
See rel-tag-issues.
General Comments
- Mary Hodder's published usability study with bloggers regarding tags Her conclusion: Bloggers asked for better tagging options and more licensing options.
- The heavy reliance on IMO poorly-conceived URL structures as "de facto best practice" means that some people who wish to provide a "tag here!" indicator in their markup can't play in your sandbox. A better solution would either take the content of the a tag as the tag, or would permit some sort of pattern-matching specification to point consumers of your tag to the "tag" portion of the URL. See rel-tag-issues. JonathanFeinberg 11:37, 9 Feb 2006 (PST)