reuse: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
 (entry-title, see also)  | 
				m (Replace <entry-title> with {{DISPLAYTITLE:}})  | 
				||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE: Reuse }}  | |||
One of several microformats [[principles]].  | One of several microformats [[principles]].  | ||
Revision as of 16:32, 18 July 2020
One of several microformats principles.
microformats reuse building blocks from widely adopted standards:
- semantic, meaningful (X)HTML, i.e. POSH. See SemanticXHTMLDesignPrinciples for more details.
 - existing microformats
- as a whole, e.g. use hCard for representing people
 - in part, reusing particular semantic class names, following microformats naming principles
 
 - well established schemas from interoperable RFCs
 
In general "doing what already works" (i.e. re-use) is greatly valued over "changing everything and starting from scratch" (i.e. re-invention).
Thus the burden of proof is always on those who wish to change or modify what already "works" to a great extent today. One clear instance of this is microformats' re-use of existing implied schemas (based on research of real world examples) and looking at existing widely interoperable standards as a basis for vocabulary as noted above, rather than inventing new idealistic a priori schemas or inventing new terminology for concepts already named in existing formats.