voting-examples: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Centralized Implementations: Add fields for digg, urbandictionary) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
=== Centralized Implementations === | === Centralized Implementations === | ||
* [http://digg.com Digg] - Digg is essentially a centralized voting system for links. Digg users can "digg" (vote-for) a link | * [http://digg.com Digg] - Digg is essentially a centralized voting system for links. Digg users can "digg" (vote-for) a link. Links with more diggs float to the top of the popular lists, hence getting more exposure and getting more diggs/votes for and against. Markup is plain html - links and images. However, the semantics of a digg are still unclear - links often get many diggs though the majority of commenters disagree with the content of the linked page. Comments on links can also be voted for or against - 'digg' or 'bury'. | ||
** Link and descriptions | |||
** # of votes ('for' votes) | |||
** controls to vote ('digg') | |||
** controls to vote on comments ('digg' or 'bury') | |||
* [http://www.urbandictionary.com Urban Dictionary] - dictionary of colloquialisms where users can vote up or down (for/against) terms in the dictionary. Markup is plain html - tables and images. | * [http://www.urbandictionary.com Urban Dictionary] - dictionary of colloquialisms where users can vote up or down (for/against) terms in the dictionary. Markup is plain html - tables and images. | ||
** Term and Definition | |||
** # of votes 'up' and 'down' | |||
** controls to vote ('up' or 'down') | |||
* Google's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank#PageRank_uses_links_as_.22votes.22 PageRank] - "In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B." Issues with PageRank's "any link is a good link" model are a major impetus to standardizing on a format for link-intention. | * Google's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank#PageRank_uses_links_as_.22votes.22 PageRank] - "In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B." Issues with PageRank's "any link is a good link" model are a major impetus to standardizing on a format for link-intention. | ||
* [http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/01/04/1544210.shtml Slashdot] - users can give comments a [http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml#cm700 karma] score which affects what comments are seen (comments can be filtered based on the score) | * [http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/01/04/1544210.shtml Slashdot] - users can give comments a [http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml#cm700 karma] score which affects what comments are seen (comments can be filtered based on the score) |
Revision as of 19:05, 5 January 2007
Voting Examples
The Problem
There has been a good bit of discussion relating to how to represent the intent of a link from one site to another as an endorsement of that site or not. See Kevin Marks on voting (Vote Links) for initial arguments for a way to represent this information.
This page serves to document the current list of voting examples from real world sites for the design of a simple voting microformat. - Steve Ivy
Participants
- Kevin Marks
- Tantek Çelik
- Steve Ivy
Discussion/Concepts
(This may belong on a page of its own)
- When is a link an endorsement? - Nathan Ashby-Kuhlman
- Anti-links - linking to things you disagree with and saying so - Kevin Marks
- Vote Links - Kevin Marks
- PageRank is Dead - Jeremy Zawodny
Real-World Examples
Centralized Implementations
- Digg - Digg is essentially a centralized voting system for links. Digg users can "digg" (vote-for) a link. Links with more diggs float to the top of the popular lists, hence getting more exposure and getting more diggs/votes for and against. Markup is plain html - links and images. However, the semantics of a digg are still unclear - links often get many diggs though the majority of commenters disagree with the content of the linked page. Comments on links can also be voted for or against - 'digg' or 'bury'.
- Link and descriptions
- # of votes ('for' votes)
- controls to vote ('digg')
- controls to vote on comments ('digg' or 'bury')
- Urban Dictionary - dictionary of colloquialisms where users can vote up or down (for/against) terms in the dictionary. Markup is plain html - tables and images.
- Term and Definition
- # of votes 'up' and 'down'
- controls to vote ('up' or 'down')
- Google's PageRank - "In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B." Issues with PageRank's "any link is a good link" model are a major impetus to standardizing on a format for link-intention.
- Slashdot - users can give comments a karma score which affects what comments are seen (comments can be filtered based on the score)
- del.icio.us, ma.gnolia, Technorati favorites - bookmarking sites that more or less represent a "for" vote
Vote Links
There are a few implementations based on the VoteLinks microformat combined with other technologies:
- Distributed votings using microformats from Artweb Design
- Boost Your Hyperlink Power - Jeremy Keith, using CSS to surface vote information
- VoteBack - VoteLink discovery + pingback/trackback
Example: Vote Links
(from: VoteLinks microformat)
<a rev="vote-for" href="http://ragingcow.blogspot.com" title="neat spoof">Raging Cow</a> <a rev="vote-against" href="http://ragingcow.com" title="nasty corn syrup drink">Raging Cow</a>
Existing Practices
- Most example sites, including Digg, UrbanDictionary.com, and Slashdot all use plain text labels or images for marking up their voting features.