xfolk-to-rdf: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Clarify RDF sketch) |
m (wiki 2 cleanup) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
< | <entry-title>xFolk/hReview → RDF</entry-title> | ||
Only a rough sketch on a piece of paper so far. "X" is the review, "Y" is the item being reviewed. | Only a rough sketch on a piece of paper so far. "X" is the review, "Y" is the item being reviewed. | ||
Revision as of 23:54, 5 December 2008
<entry-title>xFolk/hReview → RDF</entry-title>
Only a rough sketch on a piece of paper so far. "X" is the review, "Y" is the item being reviewed.
RDF prefixes used in above diagramme:
rev- http://www.purl.org/stuff/rev#
tag- http://www.holygoat.co.uk/owl/redwood/0.1/tags/
dc- http://purl.org/dc/terms/
foaf- http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
xFolk / hReview Equivalence
xFolk can be thought of as a minimal version of hReview.
| hReview Term | xFolk Term |
|---|---|
| hreview | xfolkentry |
| version | / |
| summary | / |
| type | type is always "url" |
| item fn | taggedlink (link text) |
| item url | taggedlink (href) |
| item photo | / |
| reviewer | / |
| dtreviewed | / |
| rating (best, worst) | / |
| description | description |
| tag | tag |
| permalink | / |
| license | / |
With this in mind, an xFolk entry can be treated as simply a funny-looking hReview and the hReview to RDF mapping then applied to xFolk.