currency-brainstorming
Brainstorming
Brainstorming for the proposed currency microformat.
Ben Buchanan
Verbose but extensible and explicitly defines all values (without breaking DRY):
<div class="currency">
<p class="figure">
<span class="code">code</span>
<span class="sign">symbol</span>
<span class="amount">12345</span>
</p>
</div>
"figure" is there to both explicitly associate the code, sign and amount but also allow the potential for more than one currency figure to be placed within the container. It does anticipate further development though and is the most easily dropped item at the early stage.
Without figure:
<div class="currency">
<span class="code">code</span>
<span class="sign">symbol</span>
<span class="amount">12345</span>
</div>
Super shortened, relying on the parser to identify everything via implied order/structure:
<div class="currency">ABC12345$</div>
Although the simplest solution, it has a notable vulnerability: some currencies have/had three-letter abbreviations for their currency sign, instead of a symbol. This would make it very difficult for a parser to accurately identify such a currency.
In addition, it should be noted that the order alone cannot be used to identify which parts are code, sign and amount; since many currencies are denoted with the sign after the number.
Super shortened, but specifying a currency code as a class:
<div class="currency ABC">12345$</div>
It defines...
- we're talking about money - ISO standard implied,
- we're talking about the USD variety,
- we're talking fifty units of that money,
- a parser could work out the numbers and the symbol.
The biggest limitation I can see for that shorthand is that the currency code is not displayed visibly to human readers. The currency code is useful information to viewers and ideally should be displayed.
Shortened (including dropping 'figure', but explicitly defining and displaying the currency code. This would allow a parser to treat any remaining numbers as the amount; and any remaining a-z or symbol as the sign:
<div class="currency"> <span class="code">ABC</span>12345$</p> </div>
Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Maybe something like...
Pay me <abbr class="currency" title="CAD">$</abbr>5.00 now!
Although something like the the following might be better...
Pay me <span class="money"><abbr class="currency" title="CAD">$</abbr>5.00</span> now!
But it might be more semantic salt than is considered necessary. Just having the abbr with the class-currency near a number might be good enough. But that's open for discussion though.
Ben Ward
Could pure HTML be sufficient?
<html lang="en-gb"> <p>My new T-Shirts cost £30, but it cost my friend in Canada <span lang="en-ca">$34</span></p> </html>
Arve Bersvendsen
<p lang="nb">Den kanadiske prisen på t-skjorten var <span class="currency CAD">34 $</span>.</p>
Mike Stickel
<span class="money"><abbr class="currency" title="CAD eng">$</abbr><span class="amount">5.00</span></span>
In this format the wrapping would be "money" or something similar followed by either the actual "amount" or the "currency", depending on what rules your country/language follows in regards to the order. Since there can be a difference between different languages within countries I thought it might be a good idea to include that in the "currency" definition of the formating, eg., "CAD eng" or "CAD fr". It could also give sites that list multiple languages a way to differentiate when they show multiple prices.
Ciaran McNulty
The only microformat that I've noticed currency units in is hListing, and that deliberately shies away from parsing the actual values because it's too free-form in most existing Listing formats.
My own preference would be for something like:
<p class="money">This item costs <span class="currency">GBP</span> <span class="amount">10.00</span> </p>
Which with similar parsing rules to existing formats would also allow things like:
<p class="money"> It'll cost you <abbr class="currency" title="50.00">fifty</abbr> <abbr class="amount" title="GBP">quid</abbr> , mate! </p>
Or, a more complex example with multiple languages:
<p lang="en">Price: <span class="money"> <abbr class="currency" title="GBP">£</abbr> <span class="amount">1,250.00</span> </span> <span lang="fr" class="money"> (Prix: <span class="amount">1600,00</span> <abbr class="currency" title="EUR">€</abbr> ) </span> </p>
Gary Jones
<span class="currency"> <abbr class="type" title="CAD">$</abbr> <span class="value">5.00</span> </span>
Renders as:
$5.00
If the formatting of a currency is such that the type symbol comes after the value, then simply swap the order of the type and value elements.
I do think that the use of "type" and "value" classes would be better than variations of "currency_symbol" and "amount". It follows the same principles as some other elemental formats (value excerpting), meaning it's easier to remember and implement, and even ISO4217 has codes for "currencies" that don't use symbols:
<span class="currency"> <span class="value">23</span> ounces of <abbr class="type" title="XAG">gold</abbr> </span>
Renders as:
23 ounces of gold
Following on from this, the use of a "money" class should not be used; currency does not have to be money, and having a "metal" class starts to make it convoluted. Currency is the parent of money, not the other way around.
Andy Mabbett
Straw man proposal
(this reflects Ciaran McNulty's proposals, above)
In order to use currency as a sub-class, the parent should be named 'money'
- money - class (required) [or "currency"?]
- currency - class (required; uses ISO 4217) [or "type"?]
- amount - class (required) [or "value"?]
- year - class (optional - for historic values only (or date in datetime-design-pattern? Consider inflation in Germany in 1930s!)
- symbol - class (optional - so that we know whether the symbol is present; or whether it needs to be generated by the user agent; it will also help user agents to ignore $ and other such symbols, when used for purposes other than to indicate a currency, or to remove them, when translating to a different currency.)
- unit - class (subdivison of currency; use as "symbol")
- equivalence - class (optional; conversion should be done by the user agent. Do we need this? Does it need a numeric value?)
All classes may occur only once, apart from symbol (to allow for "£14 6s 2d") and unit (to allow for "five pounds 23 pence").
Examples
Thus:
<span class="money">A widget costs <abbr class="currency symbol" title="USD">$</abbr> <span class="amount">12.57</span> </span>
<tr> <th>Spaghetti-knitter</th> <td class="money"> <abbr class="currency" title="USD"> <span class="amount">42.67</span> </abbr> </td> </tr>
<span class="money"> Can you spare <abbr class="amount" title="10">ten</abbr> <abbr class="currency" title="USD"> <span class="unit">dollars</span> </abbr>? </span>
<span class="money"> It was worth <abbr class="amount" title="0.5">50</abbr> <abbr class="currency" title="GBP"> <span class="unit">pence</span>. </abbr> </span>
(note, in the above, that "unit" does not relate directly to the amount in the amount's title abttibute - it's 0.5 pounds, not 0.5 pence.)
<span class="money">In <span class="year">1857</span> a Dickens novel cost <abbr class="amount" title="0.05">1</abbr> <abbr class="currency" title="GBP"> <abbr class="symbol unit" title="shilling">/</abbr> </abbr> </span>
(The above might be rendered as "... 1/ (worth £4.50 in modern terms" (or whatever the value would be).)
<span class="money"> <abbr class="amount" title="14.32"> <abbr class="currency" title="GBP"> <abbr class="symbol" title="pound">£</abbr>14 </abbr> 6<abbr class="unit" title="shilling">s</abbr> 4<abbr class="unit" title="old-penny">d</abbr> </abbr> </span>
<span class="money"> <abbr class="equivalence" title="EUR"> <abbr class="currency" title="FFR">10</abbr> </abbr> </span>
The following, simplified for clarity, from [1]:
On
<span class="currency">
<abbr class=date" title="1922-08-01>August 1</abbr>,
the US Dollar still stood at
<span class="value">643</span>
<abbr class="type="GDM">Marks</abbr>
</span>
to the Dollar. But on
<span class="currency">
<abbr class=date" title="1922-09-05>September 5</abbr>
the dollar had already risen to
<span class="value">1,440</span>
<abbr class="type="GDM">Marks</abbr></span>
</span>
Is there anything sensible which can't be done with the above?
Assumptions
- Working out values in secondary currencies is a (real-time or daily) job for server-side scripting or user agents.
- If "£" is an abbreviation, then its title is "pounds sterling"; though note that "£5" is pronounced as "five pounds sterling" (commonly just "five pounds") and not: "pounds sterling five" in the same way that "$5" is pronounced as: "five dollars" and not "dollars five"
Issues
- There will be complications where the entire currency has disappeared, (such as the last example; French Francs into Euros).
- Where no symbol or unit is involved (chiefly in tables, where they will be in the header cell), should we allow:
<tr> <th>Spaghetti-knitter</th> <td class="money USD amount">42.67</span></td> </tr>
Guillaume Lebleu
In-line:
Using a standard currency code:
<span class="currencyamount"><span class="currency"><abbr class="iso4217" title="Euro">EUR</abbr></span>100</span>
Rendered view:
EUR100
Using another currency representation:
<span class="currencyamount"><span class="currency"><abbr class="currencysymbol" title="Canadian dollar">CDN</abbr></span>100</span>
Rendered view:
CDN100
iso4217 IS A currencysymbol
In a table:
<table>
<tr>
<th class="currencyamount">Price (<span class="currency"><abbr title="Canadian dollar">CDN</abbr></span>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>100</td>
</tr>
</table>
Rendered view:
| Price (CDN) |
|---|
| 100 |