h-review-feedback
Revision as of 14:34, 16 May 2016 by Kylewm (talk | contribs) (→Consistency with other microformats: +1)
Feedback and discussion of h-review. Summarise any useful conclusions from discussions in irc here.
Consistency with other microformats
Some h-review properties are extremely similar to more generic, reusable properties in other microformats such as h-entry, h-recipe:
- p-reviewer => p-author
- dt-reviewed => dt-published
- e-description => e-content
What is the value of duplicating these properties? Could they be merged, increasing consistency between microformats and reducing total amount of surface area which must be remembered? As there are almost no microformats2 h-reviews in the wild, right now would be a good time to make these changes --bw 15:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- +1 Would make the publishing side a little easier, and the consuming side a lot easier. Right now, Woodwind does not display h-reviews, but if they used mostly common properties, they would be easier to add. Kylewm 14:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)