Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...="timestamp">[15:41:58]</font> <font class="normal">&lt;yipdw&gt;</font> I'm just swimming in ActiveRecord junk right now :p<br/> ...le amount? Is it sort of hoping to get to 100 but if it's 90 it's okay? I'm just trying to figure -- I know they're very nervous about their funding a
    24 KB (3,638 words) - 16:21, 18 July 2020
  • ...provision for product variations (eg. sizes) that will affect the price? I'm not aware of a precedent for variations in another microformat.
    7 KB (944 words) - 16:26, 18 July 2020
  • I'm not sure wether this can be under buttons, but I don't know where else to p
    11 KB (1,545 words) - 16:21, 18 July 2020
  • Même s'il ne supporte pas officiellement hMedia comme dans la [http://suppo ...à penser sur le fait que Google supporte véritablement ou puisse le lire, même en cherchant "Google hMedia", je ne peux trouver quoi que ce soit en ra
    6 KB (801 words) - 16:31, 18 July 2020
  • * I'm not happy with the phrasing of the above. --[[User:BenWard|BenWard]] 09:50,
    7 KB (1,069 words) - 16:35, 18 July 2020
  • * Tantek : je m'interroge si une icône rel-me est nécessaire ou appropriée ; peut-être
    8 KB (1,186 words) - 16:28, 18 July 2020
  • ...s service a good while ago, but since moving to PHP/HTML5 for this page, I'm getting this error. [[User:ARJWright|Antoine RJ Wright]] 04:17:49, 7 Januar ** 2. Add a flag to the H2VX processing URL which says "I'm a crazy XML person and my markup is 100% well formed XML, please don't tidy
    20 KB (3,188 words) - 16:23, 18 July 2020
  • <td>I'm not sure about this one. Would citation stretch over visual media? Perhaps ** Doesn't "proliferation" indicate a measure of growth? I'm not sure I see that in the industry I work in (it may be applicable to othe
    20 KB (2,940 words) - 16:28, 18 July 2020
  • ** Why? Also, I'm not aware of any microformat which is restricted to a subset of users, nor ...nding marking up "Passeriformes" but no need to go on to specify "Aves." I'm still grokking microformats so I don't think we've got a conflict. [[User:C
    32 KB (5,077 words) - 17:17, 28 April 2021
  • **Now on pages tagged in D-M-S also.
    9 KB (1,308 words) - 16:20, 18 July 2020
  • ...<code>ID</code> as well as <code>class</code>? In other words, if I know I'm gong to have only one review or only one location, or whatever, on a page,
    8 KB (1,152 words) - 16:28, 18 July 2020
  • * I'm not sure whether it makes sense to do GEDCOM as its own format, the FAM str
    7 KB (1,089 words) - 16:22, 18 July 2020
  • I'm using this page to collect brainstorms on additions to the [[process]] for
    8 KB (1,114 words) - 16:31, 18 July 2020
  • ...ing</code> seems to be used instead of <code>sparkle:version</code>, and I'm not sure why.
    12 KB (1,857 words) - 16:21, 18 July 2020
  • ** +1 [[User:DavidJanes|David Janes]]. I'm thinking of this as Entry Replies, which would be physically represented as ** [[User:DavidJanes|David Janes]] I'm happy to have whatever made up by parser implementers, which seems to be th
    22 KB (3,311 words) - 22:58, 13 July 2022
  • >eve@example.net</a> for corrections. (I know I'm not the most trustworthy
    13 KB (1,947 words) - 16:35, 18 July 2020
  • In the proposal above, the "version" class name is used, but I'm not happy about it. In other microformats, "version" is used to indicate th
    10 KB (1,570 words) - 16:21, 18 July 2020
  • *m
    10 KB (1,529 words) - 16:22, 18 July 2020
  • * +1 I'm tending to agree with the removal of version, as in practice it has not bee
    9 KB (1,316 words) - 16:26, 18 July 2020
  • *** I'm not suggesting that we create a new microformat using rev — I'm pointing out that if we define <code>rel=fan</code> (for linking to your fa
    23 KB (3,631 words) - 16:35, 18 July 2020

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)