Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • == Drafts ==
    11 KB (1,418 words) - 16:20, 18 July 2020
  • * Early drafts
    4 KB (599 words) - 22:20, 8 April 2009
  • ...nd current versions of published microformat specifications, specification drafts and publishing patterns. The wiki also hosts development resources, such as ...wer microformats, for which the specifications haven't been completed yet. Drafts are somewhat mature in the development [[process]] (see [[exploratory-discu
    8 KB (952 words) - 16:17, 18 July 2020
  • ...Card]], [[hCalendar]], and respective updates to [[hReview]] and [[hAtom]] drafts.
    4 KB (537 words) - 16:22, 18 July 2020
  • ...[[Main_Page|main page]] for a list of current microformats specifications, drafts, and discussions.
    5 KB (698 words) - 11:07, 14 March 2010
  • * Early drafts
    6 KB (1,036 words) - 03:42, 23 June 2007
  • ...that merit further research and development (and possibly documentation as drafts) per the microformats [[process]] ...isting-rel-values#formats|formats]]), which have well written microformats drafts ([[existing-rel-values#proposals|proposals]]), and which others are in deve
    8 KB (1,160 words) - 16:32, 18 July 2020
  • Les spécifications Microformat (et leurs drafts) utilisent les mots-clés "{{must-fr}}", "{{must-not-fr}}", "{{required-fr}
    5 KB (694 words) - 00:53, 21 June 2018
  • ...k-relations#rel-first</nowiki>) and hence found its way into HTML5 Working Drafts (<nowiki>https://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110113/links.html#link-type-
    6 KB (876 words) - 13:44, 23 June 2018
  • ...ction|Understanding what microformats are]] is the first step. [[Main_Page#Drafts|Understanding what kinds of Microformats exist]] is the second step. Finall ## There is a large list of Microformat specifications, drafts and exploratory discussions that could be applied to your Problem Statement
    15 KB (2,470 words) - 05:10, 8 August 2007
  • ===Q: ''How come microformats sometimes to linger as Drafts even though they seem usable?'' ===
    22 KB (3,258 words) - 05:58, 24 January 2012
  • ...e microformats are divided into &quot;Exploratory Discussions&quot;, &quot;Drafts&quot;, and &quot;Specifications&quot;. Based on feedback we've added a new === Drafts ===
    29 KB (4,410 words) - 19:10, 29 November 2022
  • ...ditto] [[rel-license]]; and [[rel-nofollow]] is from Google. In contrast, drafts being run through the process languish there for years, their proponents of
    5 KB (768 words) - 16:31, 18 July 2020
  • ...cifications|main page]] for a list of current microformats specifications, drafts, and discussions.
    5 KB (763 words) - 16:29, 18 July 2020
  • * Early drafts
    15 KB (2,194 words) - 20:34, 11 September 2010
  • ...lete within 5-10 minutes. Link to them from here as soon as possible (even drafts) so we can all review and see where everyone is at.
    8 KB (1,203 words) - 05:21, 24 June 2007
  • * Early drafts
    6 KB (930 words) - 16:41, 16 August 2021
  • ==== Drafts ==== ...éactions à partir de sources pertinentes extérieures à la communauté. Les "drafts" devront comporter au minimum ce qui suit :
    23 KB (3,729 words) - 16:31, 18 July 2020
  • * Also, would be nice if the Main_Page listings of drafts and specifications could be auto-generated from the categories, but that's
    7 KB (1,026 words) - 16:35, 18 July 2020
  • * Early drafts
    15 KB (2,076 words) - 15:36, 3 November 2009
  • [[Category:Drafts]]
    11 KB (1,587 words) - 16:28, 18 July 2020
  • See the [[Main_Page#Specifications|list of specs and drafts]] for more recommended top level microformats. ===Q: ''How come microformats stay as drafts even though they seem usable?'' ===
    34 KB (5,453 words) - 05:18, 9 October 2023
  • ...a very limited number of categories in order to present specifications and drafts differently than other wiki pages. For now if you think additional Categori
    16 KB (1,715 words) - 16:27, 18 July 2020
  • ...nclusion as quite the opposite. Because rel="cite" *is* defined in XHTML2 drafts, and microformats allow you add rel values to HTML4/XHTML1 *now*, adopting
    14 KB (2,270 words) - 23:09, 14 January 2010
  • ** Indeed any time we consider adopting anything from technologies in working drafts we should consider their stability and dependability on a case-by-case basi
    10 KB (1,570 words) - 23:41, 14 December 2020
  • ...tf.org/rfc/rfc2629 RFC2629] est un format XML pour publier des RFCs et des Drafts Internet, voir [http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.ht
    14 KB (2,131 words) - 22:09, 20 December 2008
  • ...We use a limited number of categories in order to group specifications and drafts (and the category assignments are used to render them differently than othe
    15 KB (2,272 words) - 00:45, 4 April 2013
  • ...d on the [[Main_Page|wiki home page]] that is included in other proposals, drafts. and specs. ''Recommend for adding to the [[include-pattern-faq]].
    16 KB (2,466 words) - 04:09, 7 January 2009
  • ...a very limited number of categories in order to present specifications and drafts differently than other wiki pages. For now if you think additional Categori
    15 KB (2,486 words) - 16:27, 18 July 2020
  • ...a very limited number of categories in order to present specifications and drafts differently than other wiki pages. For now if you think additional Categori
    15 KB (2,374 words) - 16:27, 18 July 2020
  • ===Q : ''Comment les microformats restent comme des drafts même s'ils semblent utilisables ?'' ===
    33 KB (5,303 words) - 16:22, 18 July 2020
  • ...comme complètement à l'opposé. Parce que rel="cite" *est* défini dans les drafts XHTML2, et que les microformats vous permettent d'ajouter *désormais* des
    16 KB (2,659 words) - 08:07, 6 January 2009
  • ....org/rfc/rfc2629 RFC2629] is an XML format for authoring RFCs and Internet Drafts, see [http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html example
    18 KB (2,672 words) - 16:26, 18 July 2020
  • ...fine root class names and property names for all existing microformats and drafts consistent with this naming convention, and require support thereof from al
    23 KB (3,339 words) - 16:43, 3 April 2018
  • ...efinition given in: http://www.cleverclevergirl.com/?p=10 : <blockquote><p>Drafts a message to send to potential sponsors, follows up leads from others for p
    21 KB (3,116 words) - 16:22, 18 July 2020
  • ...fine root class names and property names for all existing microformats and drafts consistent with this naming convention, and require support thereof from al
    19 KB (2,808 words) - 16:22, 18 July 2020
  • ...tone of microformats'''. ''Inventing new attributes, depending on unstable drafts of HTML5, using non-standard DOCTYPEs or XML extensions is not an applicabl
    27 KB (3,570 words) - 16:34, 18 July 2020
  • ...n nombre très limité de catégories afin de présenter les spécifications et drafts différemment des autres pages wiki. A cette heure, si vous pensez que des
    15 KB (2,455 words) - 16:27, 18 July 2020
  • ...are marked as 'experimental', meaning that they may be removed from future drafts or the final specification, depending on experience and feedback from imple
    36 KB (5,415 words) - 11:09, 22 September 2013
  • ...tone of microformats'''. ''Inventing new attributes, depending on unstable drafts of HTML5, using non-standard DOCTYPEs or XML extensions is not an applicabl
    27 KB (3,793 words) - 16:34, 18 July 2020
  • The right direction is "re-use" by new proposals/drafts. If you see anything in hReview that appears to overlap this new specifica
    44 KB (6,955 words) - 11:00, 14 January 2008
  • ...trong>Do not</strong> add rel values from obsolete/superceded proposals or drafts, instead add them to the table in the "dropped" section. A few rel values have been developed as drafts as a result of going through most of the microformats [[process]], and are
    89 KB (12,799 words) - 23:54, 30 November 2022
  • <!-- TODO, озн. прв. 4 ===Q: ''How come microformats sometimes to linger as Drafts even though they seem usable?'' ===
    32 KB (1,079 words) - 09:13, 9 February 2014
  • ....org/rfc/rfc2629 RFC2629] in an XML format for authoring RFCs and Internet Drafts, see [http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html example
    34 KB (4,524 words) - 19:40, 11 January 2022
  • ...fine root class names and property names for all existing microformats and drafts consistent with this naming convention, and require support thereof from al
    35 KB (5,273 words) - 15:32, 17 August 2021
  • ....org/rfc/rfc2629 RFC2629] is an XML format for authoring RFCs and Internet Drafts, see [http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html example
    55 KB (8,434 words) - 15:02, 26 May 2014
  • The right direction is "re-use" by new proposals/drafts. If you see anything in hReview that appears to overlap this new specifica
    64 KB (10,413 words) - 23:22, 1 May 2007
  • ...fine root class names and property names for all existing microformats and drafts consistent with this naming convention, and require support thereof from al
    71 KB (10,282 words) - 16:30, 18 July 2020
  • ...rimez-vous SVP sur [[rel-profile]], [[html5-profile]] ou contribuez sur un drafts [[html5-vocab]].
    75 KB (11,559 words) - 16:29, 18 July 2020
  • ...-uris|profile URLs]] for all established microformats and perhaps for some drafts as well
    74 KB (10,709 words) - 18:56, 20 November 2022

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)