Difference between revisions of "distributed-conversation-brainstorming"

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
Whereas authors in general like their work to be cited with hyperlinks, and whereas users can be counted upon to cite primary and non-primary sources without differentiating, and whereas the only difference between a primary citation and a non-primary citation is the potential for skipped vias, I propose to use '''rel="cite"''' in anchors now. (incomplete) - Andy Skelton
 
Whereas authors in general like their work to be cited with hyperlinks, and whereas users can be counted upon to cite primary and non-primary sources without differentiating, and whereas the only difference between a primary citation and a non-primary citation is the potential for skipped vias, I propose to use '''rel="cite"''' in anchors now. (incomplete) - Andy Skelton
 +
 +
==Additional Resources==
 +
* Thread Description Language - TDL is an RDF vocabulary for describing threaded discussions, such as Usenet, weblogs, bulletin boards, and e-mail conversations.
 +
** http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/2002/web-threads/
 +
** http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/2002/wtprofile/

Revision as of 20:21, 11 July 2005

citeRel brainstorming

Various parties have proposed microformats related to citations and distributed conversations. Ryan King and Eran Globen started with hVia (which became citeVia and later relVia :-)). You can see the conversation in these blog posts:

Here are the basic ideas behind citeRel:

People already cite their sources in their blog posts and it would be great (and shouldn't be too difficult) to track that information. In that vein, read this post which covers the initial thinking on the topic. (This was a followup post).

Later, Eran expanded the idea to encompass not just via citations, but replies and updates as well. Follow up post here.

Problem

The basic idea we're trying to solve here is the tracking of distributed conversation- more specifically, distributed conversation between blog posts– the scope is intentially limted here, though other aspects of distributed conversation are certainly important and related.


Citing (quoting as an authoritative source) and hat-tipping (giving credit to a non-primary source for calling attention to a primary [authoritative] source) are certainly two different animals. Common etiquette suggests use of anchor tags because they can be actuated by the user.

I dug around at WC3 and found rel="cite" is already defined in the XHTML 2.0 Hypertext Attribute Collection. Also from that collection, href and cite attributes are defined and may coexist but they behave differently: The href attribute "specifies a URI that is actuated when the element is activated." For the cite attribute, "User Agents MUST provide a means for the user to actuate the link."

Whereas authors in general like their work to be cited with hyperlinks, and whereas users can be counted upon to cite primary and non-primary sources without differentiating, and whereas the only difference between a primary citation and a non-primary citation is the potential for skipped vias, I propose to use rel="cite" in anchors now. (incomplete) - Andy Skelton

Additional Resources